Card Chronicle: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Least Cool Person of 2007-2008 championship: 1) Larry Taylor vs. 2) Mitch Barnhart

Abundance always carries with it a considerable price tag, and the media over saturation present in the world of modern sports is certainly no exception.

There is a price to be paid for unlimited highlights, statistics and analysis available at the press of a button or the click of a mouse, and perhaps the most significant sacrifice the modern fan has had to make is their ability to be blown away.

Amazing isn't amazing anymore. An individual performance that wows the nation is as foreign to this decade as an elaborate touchdown celebration was to the 1950s, or a steroid scandal was to the 1980s.

It is a privilege to be floored in this day and age, and today we celebrate the work of two men who gave us that privilege this season.

Larry Taylor signaling for a fair catch and then returning the punt 70 yards for a game-changing touchdown was Joe Namath guaranteeing victory before Super Bowl III. Him saying after the game that he didn't signal for the fair catch and then later saying that the move was premeditated, well that was Broadway Joe backing up his mouth.

When I watched Mitch Barnhart talk about turning down ESPN's offer to air the Louisville/Kentucky game on Labor Day night, I couldn't help but see Babe Ruth calling his shot in the '32 World Series. When he claimed that playing the game would make the Wildcats more susceptible to an upset five days later against Norfolk State, the vivid image of The Sultan of Swat blasting Charlie Root's curveball over the center field fence at Wrigley was undeniable.

Both of these men exist as superstars this morning, but when they're drinking their coffee this time tomorrow, only one will be a legend.

It's time.


1) LARRY TAYLOR - Punt Returner, Connecticut

Rap Sheet:

--Blatantly called for a fair catch before returning the ball 70-yards for a touchdown when the officials didn't blow the play dead.

--Made the following statement immediately after the game: "That wasn't no fair catch, that was a fair play out there. The referee didn't call anything, he said it was a fair play. I felt I didn't fair catch it anyway."

--Play very well may have cost Louisville the game, and ultimately a bowl bid.

--Had the nerve to claim that he had planned the act beforehand, and had made the official aware of his intentions.

--Attempted to repeat the maneuver multiple times in subsequent games, getting away with it twice against Cincinnati.

Redeeming Qualities:

--Plays for the relatively harmless and respectable Connecticut football program.

VS.

2) MITCH BARNHART - Director of Athletics, Kentucky



Rap Sheet:

--Put spite ahead of the well-being of his own program when he declined ESPN's offer to air the Louisville/Kentucky football game on Labor Day evening, presumably because it was what Tom Jurich wanted.

--When turning down the offer to have his team play in the time slot previously reserved for the Miami/Florida State rivalry, Barnhart used the excuse that playing on Monday would make Kentucky vulnerable for the following Saturday's home game against Norfolk State. Tennessee and UCLA ultimately accepted an offer to play the Labor Day evening game.

--Once again refused to sobbingly beg for forgiveness for his "we will own this state" remark when he took the Kentucky AD job in 2002.

--Looks goofy in pictures.

Redeeming Qualities:

--I thought he handled the multitude of Tubby/Gillispie situations well (the ones that stretched into this academic year).



It's all on you now. Who was the least cool person of the 2007-2008 Louisville sports season: Larry Taylor or Mitch Barnhart?


A champion will be crowned at midnight.

0 recs | Comment 18 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

Had to vote my heart
As much as I despise Larry Taylor and all that he represents, I've hated Mitch Barnhardt since Larry Taylor was suiting up for his high school JV team.

by dlpfis79 on May 14, 2008 9:47 AM EDT   0 recs

LARRY
This was a tough one.  My vote was leaning toward the pint-sized AD who has committed numerous crimes against the Cardinal Nation, but Larry just seems so uncool.  He is like the guy you played in touch football that always said, "No way man you never touched me." I freaking hated the guy,I am talking to you Jimmy Smith!  Since I can't vote for Jimmy, I vote Larry!

by Nathan0408 on May 14, 2008 11:23 AM EDT   0 recs

Mitch
To me he represents ALL UK FANS, who no matter what happens in a given year, are the least cool people of any sports season.  His attitude towards UofL, his idiocy with the football scheduling and his enabling of a clearly-unstable Billy Gillespie all combine to make him the epitome of the UK fans we all grew up knowing and disliking.  

Vote Mitch For Least Cool Person of 2007-08. He sucks!

by CardsFan922 on May 14, 2008 11:34 AM EDT   0 recs

all I can say....
is AMEN brother.  You said it all - pretty much.  I will add: BarnYard is obnoxious and I love the picture that Mike posted - so-o-o like his personality.
Linda

by Linda on May 14, 2008 11:57 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Don't want to burst your bubble...
on your thread of 'uncool' but no team that loses to Syracuse at home deserves a bowl bid. Sure, the UConn debacle bites a big one (if he gets belted as soon as he catches the ball like he would have you KNOW all of a sudden it's a fair catch!) but it shouldn't be allowed to come down to that. Trinity could beat Syracuse.

Most UK fans have no ties to the school at all and they cling to the success of the basketball program to bring meaning to their otherwise bleak lives. It IS all most of them have...give 'em a break...

by ddh1969 on May 14, 2008 3:10 PM EDT   0 recs

Deserve or not
If Louisville beats Connecticut, they go to a bowl.

by Mike Rutherford on May 14, 2008 4:27 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

This is a toughie!
I'm not sure who will get my vote. Both Taylor and Barnhart suck. However, I wanted Mike to know how much I have enjoyed this Olympic matchup of jackassery. I hope that there will be a separate competition for all the lame announcing we have had to endure over the last year. Heck, that competition could last the whole summer considering how many contestants should make the cut.

In the end, I think I must vote for Barnhart. He's the big picture dickhead, while Taylor is more of a little picture dickhead.  

by louisville lisa on May 14, 2008 3:32 PM EDT   0 recs

No competition..
Not sure that would be a competition.   Bending... Bending...

by Noonway on May 15, 2008 10:18 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

17 minutes to go with a 10 point lead. . . .
Yep, it was the Taylor play that cost L'Ville the game and a bowl....It had nothing to do with the stellar play of the future Heisman Trophy winner and his two picks. He did win the Heisman, right? It couldn't have been the awesome Cards defense which gave up a 10 point lead in the last 11 minutes. Yep, the game ended when Taylor raised his hand a ran down the sideline untouched (which by the way only  tied the game at 7's with 17 minutes of football left to be played). You C-USA boys need to come up with something to do in the off-season other than bitch about a loss that happened 7 months ago. .  .  The bottom line is if the Cards beat Syracue at home, they go bowling. . . See ya on Bardstown in September - 21/17 - It's in the books.

by UConn21LVille17 on May 14, 2008 10:23 PM EDT   0 recs

I nominate this guy for least coolest
Not because he points out Taylor was not the reason we lost.  He is correct.  He gets my vote for the overplayed, and at this point, completely irrelevant C-USA reference.  Last I checked UK lost to the only two C-USA basketball teams they played this past season, neither of which made the tournament.  

While we are on basketball, because you don't like what the topic of conversation is here, would you prefer us to be dedicating our time to documenting our basketball coach crying and recruiting 15 year olds.  Hope those efforts pay off, but I doubt it.  Therefore, that comment equally unnecessary.  

Back to football, I saw more H3ISMAN shirts for Mr. Woodson, who I remember having some timely fumbles and bad decisions in a big road game as well.  He did not exactly earn a trip to New York either.  Strike Three.  Sit down and better luck next time.  

If you left it at Taylor is really a scapegoat for bad plays by UofL down the stretch, you could have left with your head held high, but couldn't resist the trash talk.  Therefore, thousands like you who believe in the toxic rhetoric of Mitch secured my vote.  

by adamcards on May 14, 2008 11:29 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Early frontrunner for uncoolest comment of 2008-09
(1)    Inability to read - "Play very well may have cost Louisville the game, and ultimately a bowl bid" becomes "that's the only reason UofL lost the game."  
(2)    Complete avoidance of the real issue - the fact that his superstar engaged in premeditated cheated, then denied cheating, then proudly admitted to cheating, then tried to cheat in later games, and was awarded the game ball by the coach who was so proud of the cheating.  By the way, the insignificance of the play was really emphasized by Taylor getting the game ball from the coach, wasn't it?  Didn't matter a bit, huh?
(3)    Insulting reference to C-USA by a fan of a team that was in DI-AA at the same time.  And by a fan of a team that needed to cheat to win its first game against the Cards.  
(4)    Complete ignorance of the issue - a battle of uncoolness.  No one's bitching about the UConn loss; we're just arguing about whether Taylor's premeditating cheating was less cool than Mitch Barnhardt's "if it's bad for UofL, I'm for it" campaign.  You've offered nothing to defend Taylor's coolness because, of course, there's nothing good to say.  

by 83fan on May 15, 2008 8:57 AM EDT to parent up   0 recs

A fine summation!
I particualrly enjoyed the Div I-AA remark

by frankpos on May 15, 2008 3:01 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Clearly, yes
Or at least a 1 seed in that tournament.  

by 83fan on May 16, 2008 1:34 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Uconn
I dont think its the fact that we lost the game or a chance at a bowlgame b/c of this play that people think Taylor is the least coolest person. Personally i voted for him because he acted as if he did this on purpose after the game and said he told the ref he was going to do it, and the fact that he had that smirk on his face on the sideline after the play. Revenge is sweet, and there will be revenge.

by Final4Galore on May 15, 2008 12:56 AM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Card Chronicle, the Louisville sports blog Otis George might read if he knew it existed.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Tom___linda_birthday_small
Favre coming back?????
Louhelllogowince_small
The Original Dream Game - U of L vs. UK 1983
Einstein_tongue_small
Jumbo coaches
Small
Another FB Player Out
Small
Jared Swopshire
Einstein_tongue_small
Only 799 days to go...
Cardinallogowallpaper-1024_small
Conspiracy Theory!
Tom___linda_birthday_small
Bill Curry .....
Louhelllogowince_small
How Dirk Minnifield Will Save Card Football
Small
Student Section Name

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter