Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Oliver: SEC wants Louisville, Kentucky does not

Not going to lie, I would never have guessed that this would be the next major piece of news in the never-ending realignment soap opera.

Chuck Oliver - the self-proclaimed "King of College Football" - has confirmed the rumor that the SEC has said "thanks, but no thanks" to West Virginia (a move the ACC has reportedly mimicked). But the bigger story is who the SEC does want, and according to Oliver, it's Louisville. 

Of course, there's one thing blocking U of L from becoming the 14th member of the SEC: Lexington Basketball Academy. Oliver says UK is not cool with the reigning Governor's Cup champions joining the league, and has veto power for any school within its state borders.

So where does this leave the Cards? Oliver continues.

If Missouri does get the SEC invite, the Big 12 (if it exists) emerges as the likely destination for Louisville. As of this morning, Louisville’s attention is split between trying to stay in the SEC’s discussion and waiting on news from Texas. If the Longhorns stay in the Big 12 and the SEC only expands to 14, expect Louisville to join the Big 12 as soon as Texas is confirmed. An invitation to the ACC is not on anyone’s list of possibilities, as both sides recognize the academics of Louisville and the poor fit it would be in that league. However . . .

The Cardinals’ one chance to heave the dice down the table and win the ultimate prize of SEC membership is if the conference expands to 16. At that point, they’re in, Kentucky smiles big and pretends to be happy about it and both schools try to make nice, to some degree, going forward. The move to 16 would almost certainly involve FSU and Clemson, among a few other high-profile schools, re-entering the discussion.

Expect all of this to resolved with two weeks.

Awesome.

That was a sarcastic awesome.

Also, I don't care for the University of Kentucky.

Comment 341 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

All this conference mumbo jumbo

is boring. Let me know where we land, when we do. Until then, I’m still waiting on my cardinal head bulletin-ed game recap of the Governor’s Cup.

Careful man, there's a beverage here!

by cards84 on Sep 20, 2011 1:39 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Someone please tell me why you would not want us in the SEC (as a UL fan)?

I do see us as a better fit in the ACC (academics notwithstanding). The bottom line is our only other option may be what is left of the Big 12. If that is without UT and OU, someone please make an argument for why the SEC is a bad place to fall, as the Big East will only be basketball only conference.

by HendoCard on Sep 20, 2011 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not true.

I want to put up a fight. I don’t want to go down that easy… and the SEC is literally my worst nightmare. Basketball competition= Non-exsistent.

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know what, yeah.

To win a NC under the SEC logo would truly be tough for me. I would not be proud to be a part of the SEC.

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with GCA

The thought of SEC football is AMAZING to me, though it would be better if we had a couple more years to build so we don’t become a cellar dwellar – it will help keep Charlie Strong here for EVER, and obviously recruiting.

But the thought of SEC basketball disgusts me. It also takes away from the rivalry if you ask me, if we are playing UK in the SEC tournament and not just a regular OOC game. Good teams aside, I would rather watch us play Providence, Marquette, and St. Johns than I would Arkansas, Georgia, and Mississsippi State. Also, NYC > Atlanta

I think if the Texas Schools stay than that is perfect for football for us to join the Big XII, basketball will suffer a little but we will get to play Baylor, Texas, Kansas, K-State and than have OOC games with UK and probably Syracuse/Pitt/UCONN to keep some good rivalries alive.

Best Case Scenario – Northwestern randomly goes to the ACC and we join the Big 10. Michigan State, Michigan, Ohio State, Nebraska, Purdue, Illinois, Iowa…. that is the perfect balance of football and basketball competition.

by I WantReeceBack! on Sep 20, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know, me too!

But those are the “2nd tier” type schools in our conference, I am saying I would much rather see us play them than Georgia or Auburn, ecchhh

by I WantReeceBack! on Sep 20, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

There's something you, and GCA, have got to take into consideration with that stance

The Basketball, in WETF the Big East/12 left overs end up calling themselves, isn’t going to be all that awesome anymore.
Uconn, Syracuse, and Pitt walking away takes 3 teams off of that awsome schedule each year.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where's UConn.

Nothing is anything until it’s final.

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm upset about Pitt, but honestly

Cuse has been sucking it up. If we can keep Nova and UConn… ???

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would be cool but, I really think that if the "merger between BE/B12 happens,... that the former basketball only schools will go theri own way.

They would probably form a basketball/ other sports league with ND.
Marquette
ND
Nova
G-town
St.Johns
Prov
SH
Depaul and take in a school like Temple, Xavier, Butler, or all three
That would be a good Basketball league and they wouldn’t have to worry about Football steering their future in Basketball anymore.
I’m sure their all pretty PO’d about this

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who could be more PO'd than me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Marquette, ND, Nova, G-town, and SJU are my friends.
I don’t wanna go.
Someone.
Somebody.

…..help.

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

basektball doesn't matter

If UofL ends up in the SOL conference, they can fill the non-conference games with old regional rivals and other good teams. The biggest loss is not competing in the Big East tournament, but one could argue that may help NCAA tournament performance.

by UL is my hot hot sex on Sep 20, 2011 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Try to understand

everything you DON’T like about the SEC…you WOULD like if we were members.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

BUT

and i say this as someone who purchases multiple beers per game…you have to admit it would put more asses in the seats during games.

Its a worthy sacrifice any way you look at it. Not like you can’t still tailgate.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

i know, i’m mainly kidding about it. it is my only real peeve with the SEC, though.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

ooooooooohhhhh nooooooo

Seriously I can’t take you seriously any more. Alcohol is what makes UofL fans so weak compared to other fan bases. Maybe we’d get more people at games who actually want to watch the game, not party with friends

by sam34gtr on Sep 20, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

....

Are you daft???

Alcohol doesn’t have anything to do with who is in the stands. I drink and I’m there every home game and I’m not streaming out of the stands with the 4th quarter left.

I can’t take you seriously anymore…if you correlate the consumption of alcohol with a weak fan base that doesn’t show up to games in the first place and doesn’t stay until the game is over I’m not really sure how rational you are. If we believe that drinking alcohol (which is sold in the stadium to the fans who go in) is causing our fans to not go to the stadium… that’s just not logic at all.

Are you a closet prohibitionist?

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's actually very rational

People stay in the parking lot drinking the much cheaper beer, sometimes they don’t even make it into the game they get so wasted.
Then they’re in there watching the game with their beer goggles on and if it doesn’t look promising in the 4th quarter they’re back to the parking lot where it doesn’t cost them a fortune to keep the buzz going.
Tell me I didn’t just describe 10 “fans” that you know

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

really, you didn’t just describe 10 “fans” that I know.

Maybe I just don’t know a lot of fans, though. All the fans I know are in their seats during the game unless they leave to grab a beer and head straight back.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok,...

Tell me you don’t see swaths of empty seats at every game and people who are so drunk they can barely walk streaming out of the stadium 2-4 minutes into the 4th quarter if we’re not winning.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

no

i do see swaths of empty seats at every game.

i do see drunk people at every game.

i just don’t see a correlation between the consumption of alcohol with the emptiness of seats.

you said it yourself: “streaming out of the stadium 2-4 minutes into the 4th quarter if we’re not winning.”

i correlate the empty seats with whether the team is winning, the time frame of the game (5 pm on a thursday night? yeah, gonna be empty), and the fickleness of the fans.

i think blaming it on consumption of alcohol is excessive…some fans may be influenced to leave by the fact they are about to vomit, but more are in all likelihood influenced by the fact that they made poor decisions on where to park and the lack of public transportation to get them home before 2 a.m.

also, the fans who are influenced to leave by the urge to vomit… should leave. that stuff’s gross.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its the fact that thousands of people

are constantly leaving their seats to get another beer. Theres no way to grab a beer and head straight back. Its usually a 5 minute trip minimum. Then you have to go pee more as well which is more time out of the seat.

Its just a fact. Im guilty myself.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

during the actual game

it’s pretty empty down there in the concourse.

i think we must agree to disagree.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is he SANE?!?!?

smile and make nice?!??!?!? Whattt? Who is this looney tune.

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Btw..."Weak Academically"...

doesn’t mean our programs aren’t nationally ranked, because several are.

doesn’t mean that we don’t have very smart people who are appointed as Fulbright, Rhodes, etc. scholars, because we have a great deal of those as well.

What “weak academically” does mean is that UofL’s endowment doesn’t stack up with other ACC schools and we don’t have as many research dollars pouring in the doors as other schools.

by Remote Cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Assuming this is true

I think it’s very possible that other SEC schools, or maybe U of L itself, leaked the info to put pressure on UK.

For what it’s worth though, my understanding is that Kentucky doesn’t have sole veto power, instead you need 25 % of the teams to veto.

Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and Kentucky have made the so called “gentleman’s agreement” that they will band together to prevent any other instate school (Florida St, Clemson, and Georgia Tech). So technically we would only need one of them to change their vote (assuming this is all true)

by whitacreky on Sep 20, 2011 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

According to the copy of the SEC constitution I just read on their website

this is indeed the case. It’s a 3/4 majority vote for membership. It would have a to be an unspoken agreement among several institutions, that is, assuming nearly 3/4 of the schools want us in.

by centre_card on Sep 20, 2011 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can the gentleman’s agreement withstand the force of conference realignment? If the SEC wants to get to 16 teams, it has to go somewhere. That somewhere is not the ACC now.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, we could play a hypothetical game here

Vandy: No known reason to oppose…YES
Florida: Strong ties (pun-intended)…YES
Alabama: Unless they hold the 1991 Fiesta bowl against us, YES
Georgia: Why would they hate us? Probably would be okay if GaTech in SEC… YES
Tenn: Hmm, more difficult, some pretty rough basketball games, but to spite UK, YES
South Carolina: Wouldn’t want Clemson, NO
UK: No
Ole Miss: Yes.
Miss St.: No, because Ole Miss said yes. (This could go vice-versa).
Arkansas: Bobby hates UK, so yes, UL gets in.
LSU: No…but then Yes after UK storms the field.
Auburn: No, because Alabama said yes and we didn’t give up Petrino.

I think that puts it at 75% pro.

by centre_card on Sep 20, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

That would maybe make sense if it were the football coaches that were ones voting. But I have a feeling that’s not the case.

I bleed red and black. I poop blue.

by neecebravo on Sep 20, 2011 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clemson, Georgia Tech, and FSU are pretty set in the ACC. That leaves UK out in the cold regarding the SEC Gentleman’s agreement. That is, there is no reason for the USC, Florida, and Georgia to stick to the agreement right now. This does not mean these schools necessarily want UL, but I don’t see them stopping our entry.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

The "because somebody i like voted the other way" stuff is totally unrealistic

To borrow a phrase from one Damarcus Smith, it’s a business decision.

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

somebody I DON'T like

Why is it I always seem to proofread right AFTER hitting POST?

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course..

Lexington Prepatory Academy doesn’t want us in. They want us in the worst conference possible so that they might actually have a chance at out-recruiting us in Football, and maintaining their dominance in SEC hoops. What a bunch of scared Bitches.

by DowntownCards on Sep 20, 2011 1:48 PM EDT reply actions  

And so

they can continue to say “oh you guys couldn’t make it in teh SEC.”

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kentucky is scared if us. Tell em put their balls where they mouth is.

I Think I'm Big East! (Rick Ross Voice)

Follow Me @Victory4Mation

by AllinWithMyCards on Sep 20, 2011 1:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Guess it depends how bad the SEC wants us.

If they REALLY want us, I suspect we will get an invite regardless of what UK wants.

Can anyone explain the veto arrangement? Is it real? Or is it the agreement between these schools that they will all veto a school within one of those states if the SEC school wants it?

And does UK have a valid reason other than “we hate UofL”?

by CardinalDude on Sep 20, 2011 1:59 PM EDT reply actions  

How about

They will never beat us in football again if we can recruit as an SEC school.

by HendoCard on Sep 20, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

SEC Consitution 3.1.2

“Granting of Membership. Membership may be granted by an invitation of the Conference at a regular or called meeting. A three-fourths vote of members is required to extend an invitation for membership. [Revised 5/30/91]”

by centre_card on Sep 20, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

ACC

No ACC School is now up for the SEC. The Presidents just accepted a buyout clause of $40 mil, and that is just too much money to get from boosters to switch conferences. Especially when the ACC is technically safe from the whole mess. The SEC isn’t going to pay Clemson or FSU to join the league, and it doesn’t need to.

by rednblackfan4life on Sep 20, 2011 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought it was $20 million

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Regardless

Every President agreed to it, why would they do that if they have their eye’s on the SEC? Again, the ACC has positioned itself to be one of the big leagues, no reason to think the SEC is going to cherry pick a school or too. And Clemson and FSU are both in states that have current SEC schools. Florida, one of the most powerful schools in the conference could also veto any move for FSU.

by rednblackfan4life on Sep 20, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would prefer the Big 12 over the SEC!!!

After the LHN debacle with the PAC-12, it looks like Texas is in the Big 12 for the long haul. Still not sure about Oklahoma. I could still see them jumping ship for the PAC-14 at some point in the future. The Big 12, even with OU gone and UT still there would be a legitimate conference home for the Cards along with WVU and BYU. Much better football than the Big East. Basketball would be okay. This move opens access to the Texas markets for basketball (and to some extent football) recruiting. I still think we should keep some non-conference games with Georgetown, Villanova, and St. Johns to keep the East Coast pipeline open. This could work well for us.

by cardgrad on Sep 21, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

HELL. YES.

I would kill to be in the SEC. Please got let this happen.

I was hoping the Jurich/Slive relationship would come through.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Count me among those who like this bit of news

I would obviously much rather be in the position of the SEC wanting us and UK being opposed, than the other way around.

My belief is that UK is the least influential of these schools in the “gentlemen’s agreement” and they thus pose a much smaller obstacle than perceived.

twitter.com/jasonpsmith

by quiet cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

count me among those...

who would have hated to hear this news a couple of weeks ago, but now, i dont see how any cardinal fan wouldnt want this to happen. After all that has happened over the past 72+ hours, this is the best possible place for UL to land. Im considering of coarse, the fact, that The BIG and ACC are completely out of the discussion. Also, the PAC1x doesnt make any sense geologically, and the TWEAST, while also making zero sense geologically, would be mediocre at best in FB and BB. If UL were to somehow end up in the SEC, I would be thanking my lucky stars. Its the dream scenerio as of now

by grey on Sep 20, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely.

We, as fans have to realize how miserable our bargaining position really is using the criteria that they use for conference realignment. I would consider it somewhat of a godsend to not end up on the outside looking in. This means that our reservations based on fanship and emotion have to take a backseat to business. If we want to continue to build a national program in football, and keep Louisville basketball as the type of national brand we’ve built in the BE, we need to take the very first opportunity we get for any of the super conferences.

by James Sutherland on Sep 20, 2011 4:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

i'm on the fence

I definitely would take the invite to the SEC.

However, I don’t see super conference membership as necessary to create a national brand

look at boise state….they don’t haul in a lot of cash and they’ve been to a BCS bowl 4 out of the past 5 years.

I’m not saying we would do that, I’m just saying it’s a possibility.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 6:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

The stars really had to align for Boise to make their past decade as incredible as it has been.

The primary variable for their success was keeping their coaching talent. Also, their conference affiliation looks a bit different to me because quite frankly, they’re used to being in a lower tier conference.

From a football perspective, to keep big time coaching talent we must have a big time stage for them to compete on, and be committed as a program to putting ourselves in a position to win a national championship. As wonderful as Boise has been, it will be a cold day in hell before they play for a NC, and that is completely because of their conference affiliation.

I also don’t want for the stars to have to align for our program to have continuity. It seems like the safer bet is to get to the big kids table, slam $5 million down, and tell HCCS to work his magic.

I definitely see your point. I can’t argue with that example on principle, only likelihood with respect to how dramatically the landscape is shifting. I would rather not spend the next decade hoping to be the exception to the rule as Boise has been.

by James Sutherland on Sep 20, 2011 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh, i’m not arguing on likelihood, I doubt it as well.

However, I think all the crazy concerns about HCCS leaving are a bit over the top, kind of like Pitino getting hired away… Strong won’t leave unless he thinks he’s taken this program as far as he can, he feels a great loyalty to the university for giving him a chance and has already endowed a scholarship here.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

He would hit a considerably lower ceiling if we end up on the outside looking in. What you can do with a Louisville program in a second tier league is different than what you can do with Louisville in the SEC.

I think the Pitino/Strong comparison is apples to oranges. Complete different career stages, and if Louisville Football = Louisville Basketball we probably wouldn’t be in this pickle.

I certainly think HCCS has a sense of loyalty, but in the environment that’s being created the winner of whatever fall out conference the BE becomes will simply be regarded as the 65th best team in the country, kind of like the winner of the NIT.

Obviously exaggerated quite a bit, I just think HCCS is a championship caliber coach, and we have a window of opportunity to become a championship caliber Football program. To me, that window narrows significantly if we don’t end up in power conference when the chips fall.

by James Sutherland on Sep 20, 2011 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

sorry, gotta call BS
the winner of whatever fall out conference the BE becomes will simply be regarded as the 65th best team in the country

The Big XII/Big East merger, if it happens, will be a BCS conference, and the winner will go to a BCS bowl. If you win a BCS bowl, you are not regarded as #65 in the country.

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kansas, K-State, Iowa St, Baylor, TCU, Cincy, WVU, USF, UofL

That doesn’t look like a BCS conference to me. At least not in comparison to what the other conferences are going to look like. Who’s to say they don’t strip that auto-bid? It’s not like anything seems to be off the tale in this mess.

I see what you’re saying though, and if it played out that way I would certainly agree with your point.

by James Sutherland on Sep 20, 2011 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

B!G is definitely out for us on academic grounds. Louisville is not an Associaiton of American Universities (AAU) school. ACC is a long shot. Athletics and geography are a good match. Academics lag a bit, but not as much as people think. We could possibly get in if the conference goes to 16 teams and Rutgers goes to the B1G. With Texas likely staying in the Big 12, and Oklahoma there for at least a while longer, I would prefer the Big 12 over the SEC.

by cardgrad on Sep 21, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Indeed, and apparently WVU is still in the mix

http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/2011/9/20/2437386/sec-expansion-west-virginia-conference-realignment

I suppose it’s possible, strange as it may sound, that the ACC really has blocked defections and the SEC is looking further down its at us, Mizzou and even WVU. That trio would certainly up the hoops value of the league.

by TriviaGeek on Sep 20, 2011 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeesh, if that wild possibility came to pass...

our annual football opponents would be:

Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
South Carolina
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
West Virginia

and some duo of

Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
LSU
Mississippi
Miss. State
Missouri
Texas A&M

That ups the competition just a bit.

by TriviaGeek on Sep 20, 2011 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Perfect

For keeping a certain coach around and helping recruiting.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd invite the challenge

I, and a host of others, sincerely believe the Cards can be a power on the big stage. This would make us prove it.

The train’s still chugging along either way, in my opinion.

twitter.com/jasonpsmith

by quiet cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

SEC Landlocked

The AAU membership requirement affects who the B1G can invite into the conference. That point has been well established. One thing that the people ignore about the SEC is that the conferences identity landlocks them in the SEC. The conference is, has been, and always will be, a SOUTHERN conference with a southern attitude. That will keep the SEC from expanding to most of the Big 12 schools. With the ACC strenghthened and most of the remaining Big 12 programs off the table, Louisville becomes a viable option. I personally think, though, that a Big 12 with at least Texas and possibly Oklahoma too is a better option than the SEC.

by cardgrad on Sep 21, 2011 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Academically

I’d say we fit in fine with the likes of Florida State, Clemson and Virginia Tech. Give me a freaking break about academics. Florida State for the love of god!

by collegeofcardinals on Sep 20, 2011 2:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't understand the writer's claim that Kentucky vetos us at 14 teams, but not at 16

What’s the difference? Why would UK suddenly be ok with it if the league decided to expand to 16 teams?

________________________________________________
www.lordkayoss.com

by LORD KAYOSS on Sep 20, 2011 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

because

if the league went to 15 teams they’ll override UK no matter what b/c there won’t be any options that the rest of the league is ok with.

They just need 3/4 of the vote to get us in, but there’s the gentleman’s agreement with Georgia, SC, Florida, and UK which means they only need one vote more to block us. If they have no other option, the agreement will fall apart once WVU and Mizzou are in.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see

Thanks for the info.

________________________________________________
www.lordkayoss.com

by LORD KAYOSS on Sep 20, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

The SEC wants Missouri more than it wants Louisville. Hence, Mizzou gets the vote over Louisville to add the 14th school. If Mizzou gets into the SEC, and the SEC is unable to raid the ACC as planned, Louisville and WVU become the only viable candidates for expansion.

by cardgrad on Sep 21, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

ACC Is Insane

If they really wanted to be proactive they would become a 16 team conference ASAP by adding Syracuse, Pitt and UCONN (as is rumored) as well as bringing in West Virginia and Louisville and be done with it. You confirm basketball dominance as a conference forever and come away with some better than average football, at least with Pitt, UL and WVU. What’s so complicated about this?

by collegeofcardinals on Sep 20, 2011 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

It'd be a mixed blessing

if in the SEC we’d immediately be shooting for 4-5th place every yr including this one.

IMHO, the way things are headed with the Big Tweast (12+east) is we’re gonna end up laughing at how much easier our path to the bcs game is than everyone else. i believe they won’t have the balls/clout to take away the tweast’s bcs status, and we’ll have a MUCH better post-season path than the poor schleps trying to win the super conf’s. Sure we’ll have to keep taking abuse about our conf, but we’ll be laughing all the way to the orange bowl.

by MattKeck on Sep 20, 2011 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

sooo...

basically, you’re saying that we have a crappy football team that will never improve and we’ll never get to a bcs bowl if we have real competition.

thanks for the support! :)

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

not really. with the totally unbalanced schedule of 16-team conf, there will be multiple 6-2 teams, so some really good teams will go 6-2 and be 5th or 6th based on tie-breakers.

by MattKeck on Sep 20, 2011 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

i have no doubt in our ability to roll all over some SEC teams with another year or two of recruiting. Remember this… HCCS is a defensive god. We’re already starting to play SEC style defense.

I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree… besides, to me a shot at a national championship is much more important than going to a BCS bowl, and to be honest the Big East’s chances at that were almost nil without 12-0 and every SEC team losing twice.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Until our orange bowl

coach leaves for greener pastures and we get kragthroped again.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

EXACTLY

Best case scenario for a 10 year period is hitting the jackpt three coaches in a row. No one would stay in our conference because even the bottom feeders in the billion dollar conferences would be able to pay head coaches more than us, at that point. If we’re in the SEC, unless Charlie goes on an unprcedented tear and wins 2 or 3 conference titles and a national title, we should be able to keep him. If that happens maybe Alabama or someone makes an offer we can’t compete with. I’d be thrilled to lose CCS like that. I’d hate to lose him because he goes 8-4 in the Tweast and Ole Miss just went 2-10 and needs someone, anyone

by uoflcard on Sep 20, 2011 2:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

How would any other school

be able to make an offer that the most financially successful athletics program in the nation couldn’t afford to match?

If we win 2 or 3 SEC titles and a national championship, Charlie is sitting on top of the world right where he is. Why would he leave?

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Conference prestige + football tradition + recruiting advantage + in-state recruiting > $$$

Louisville has the $$. They’d pay Petrino as much/more than Arkansas does if he stayed.

by UL is my hot hot sex on Sep 20, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh, I think I'd take the Orange Bowl-quality home games

and a conference title would feel like a national title. Also, I think a 2 loss SEC team would get serious consideration over an underrated Tweast, especially since it will now be next to impossibletk schedule a big OOC game. LSU and others would be out of their mind to schedule someone like Oregon now, much less a dangerous Tweast team

by uoflcard on Sep 20, 2011 2:36 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

yes it’s true gteed big-time opponents would be fun. but every year you’re gonna maybe win one of those very tough games and lose one or two of them and voila, 5th place! Now maybe 5th place equals a pretty great bowl like capital one, but i’d rather beat a bunch of chumps, be the only undefeated team in the land, and sail into the rose bowl.

by MattKeck on Sep 20, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

jealous

The acc and sec got together to end the big east. Acc was the big bball power until the big east expanded . I don’t care were we go as long as it is still bcs conference. If u can’t beat big east bball then destroy it . Thanks cheatapri and acc , fa**

by jamesc11 on Sep 20, 2011 2:40 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

you're correct on the two loss front

Two loss LSU played one loss Ohio State for the National Championship in 2007 while one loss Kansas was relegated to an at large bid in the fed ex bowl.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 2:43 PM EDT reply actions  

yes that’s all true. but 70% of the sec chumps won’t get within sniffing range of that fed ex bowl. You can bet sUcK fans have secretly coveted the fun we’ve had having a realistic chance at a bcs bowl these past few yrs. they got none of that.

by MattKeck on Sep 20, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kentucky will eventually want UL in the SEC.

They might not want Lou in right now, b/c they still get to hang the “better conference” title over our heads. They’ve used it for years as the end all be all to every argument a Louisville fan puts up. The fact is, long term, having two teams from the state of Kentucky in the “Big 64” is imperative. It keeps the state competitive with all other states and of course will bring in much more money. I just hope we can land in one of the power conferences soon and end all the speculation. I’d hate to see a demotion back to a smaller conference.

by Card-in-nati on Sep 20, 2011 2:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes! +1

And by +1, I mean I actually also took the time to Rec your comment after saying +1.

by guyngreen on Sep 20, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

UK might like that.

It’ll be one less loss they’ll count on every year from now on.

Stout Out!

by tdstout on Sep 20, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fantastic.

"Morgan Newton sucks!"
- Victor Anderson

by HorsePig55 on Sep 20, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Love this comment!

You even got GCA to react, although she has to realize that if they give in, we’re in the dreaded SEC!
Although I do want to ensure a BCS slot, I do agree that it will be hard to get up for Ole Miss, Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, LSU, etc.etc. in basketball every year. But, that being said, I would LOVE to play and beat the crap out of Tenn. every year, something the Cats have so much trouble with.

by David Lyons on Sep 20, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

UK fans would hate it.

But I still think that UK doesn’t like playing us in football anyways.

by CardinalDude on Sep 20, 2011 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cute

Of course, it’s fantasy. We’re required by law to play each other every year. But it’s a funny thought anyway.

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

From what i see, if Texas stays BigXII OR SEC goes to 16...

…then we’re a lock for a great conference. Either Missouri goes SEC and we take their spot, they stay and we go SEC, or the SEC goes 16 and we’re probably in the SEC, even if a Texas-occupied Big XII exists at that point.

If Texas stays we I think Missouri turns down the SEC. Down the road if there is more turmoil, they’d still get into the SEC or maybe even the B1G. But think about Mizzou fans in the north and west parts of the state. Arkansas would be the only remotely driveable conference game. That has to be a tremendous part of their thought process. If Texas, OU, OKST and TTU all stay, that is still a really good conference. We are desperate for something better, but they would be in no such situation in that spot. They’d get a huge TV deal, and like I said, if the s*** fan starts whirling in the near future, they will be the safest of any of the teams left

by uoflcard on Sep 20, 2011 2:53 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Indeed

At least we know we still have one last year of it left

by whitacreky on Sep 20, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Amen, old man. AMEN.

We’re all going this year. NYC12CC

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

This just in, Louisville beat Kentucky last Saturday

And Syracuse and Pitt have already made most people forget. Sad. Frustrating.

I hope we end up somewhere. Somewhere that will allow us to celebrate a victory over our rival and not worry about the future.

I don’t like you Syracuse and I really fucking hate you Pitt. Kentucky, you already know how I feel.

#TransferChickenToTheBucket.

by noobmaster on Sep 20, 2011 3:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Why hasn't anyone mentioned UL's revenue rankings?

Isn’t that alone enough to make a power conference leap?

by 97E3LPL on Sep 20, 2011 3:27 PM EDT reply actions  

you would think

considering were #1 in revenue, but nooo UK gets butthurt because they would remain the laughingstock of football and have credible basketball competition year in and year out. The ACC I have no idea whats going on in their heads. I mean to have at least the top 5 if not the top 3 in revenue and not even offer but be snobs over academics??

by rockchickpeg on Sep 20, 2011 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

ACC= snobs

but I’m watching my mouth because… I might ask to go there if things get real bad.

by GOCARDSATTITUDE on Sep 20, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

This ^

is why it doesn’t matter. It’s about entering new markets and how many people can you put in the stands at football games… and how many people does your stadium hold for the other team’s fans. For the ACC and Big 10, it’s also about academics (so they say) and we don’t make that cut. We better hope the SEC goes to 16 or the Big 12 stays together and takes in us refugees from the now all-but-dead Big East.

by CardsRuleBE on Sep 20, 2011 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Debating this is one of those things that makes me angry.

But think of the possibilities- I’ll say them again
And throw out the crap about the basketball schedule

1. Better football
2. Very easy trip to a one or two seed
3. More $$$
4. Better Facilities
5. Playing on CBS instead of ESPNU and the BEN
6. More stadium improvements (soccer, baseball, PJCS, heck, even the Yum could be improbed)
7. Not with Big 12 rejects (not really that bad, but the SEC wins in this case)

Objections?

"Morgan Newton sucks!"
- Victor Anderson

by HorsePig55 on Sep 20, 2011 3:33 PM EDT reply actions  

And

8. Better recruiting
9. If we win the Big East, we go to last Bowl that will take us, only because they have to.
If we win the SEC we go to the NATIONAL FREAKING CHAMPIONSHIP.

"Morgan Newton sucks!"
- Victor Anderson

by HorsePig55 on Sep 20, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

And

10. UK can’t talk crap about we are in a shit football conference
11. Value of my season tickets goes way up
12. No lame conference games. Every game would be exciting
13. Keep charlie strong

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, the SEC doesn't sponsor soccer

we’d have to join another league for that. UK actually plays soccer in C-USA, I believe.

by TriviaGeek on Sep 20, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we end up in the SEC, we need to push for the SEC East for football reasons.

by cardgrad on Sep 21, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I told you so...

Did I not tell you all that the SEC is racist and doesn’t want a program with a good African American coach in the league? Do you think it is coincidence that now they are saying “oh but we want UofL but it’s Kentucky keeping them out”. Yeah right. Blame Kentucky the only school that has a black coach in their league, so you can’t call it racism… Shame on you SEC, you haven’t changed!

by chango on Sep 20, 2011 3:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Wanna know what they will say next?

They’ll say they were juuuuuussssssttt about to sign us but Missouri signed up before they could convince Kentucky it was a good idea and now they are full. Mark my words then you will know I am a prophet.

by chango on Sep 20, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

This exceeds the bounds of all rational thought

Yes, that is hyperbole… but not by much

twitter.com/jasonpsmith

by quiet cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude,... wake up and get your head out of 1962

This is 2011, where it’s just as damaging to race relations to make wild accusations with no proof what so ever.
If you’re gonna play the race card you better have an Ace up your sleeve, not a 2 of clubs.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude... wake up Charlie strong was hired just last season and one of the first things he told us is about how the SEC tries to keep black FOOTBALL coaches down.

That the SEC has a history of discriminatory practices against black coaches is fact. That these are the reasons UofL is getting passed on by SEC expansion is hypothesis…welcome to online discussions about sports….we speculate.

by chango on Sep 20, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im telling you:

1. Online sports discussion are 90% speculation.
2. We don’t live in a color blind society and race does impact sports.
3. If you can’t handle a discussion about race and whether or not something might be racism then that is not my fault.
4. I will not “scream” racism anymore that is a valid point. Sometimes I put things in all caps and I shouldn’t.

by chango on Sep 20, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not only have you lacked both, but your tone has been insulting and condescending to anyone who doesn't agree with your point of view.

Also, I don’t know where you’re used to commenting, probably ESPN judging by your tone, but here at the CC, it’s not really like that; and everyone does a pretty good job of being respectful of other people’s opinions as long as you do the same.
Blind refusal to even acknowledge that your point of view could be wrong will get you no respect here

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

UK doesn't want a good black coach in the SEC, but

they have a black coach?

Tinfoil hat time.

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 20, 2011 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am just curious, for those of you who claim that this guy might be right,

What possible reason would UK have to want to keep out UL?

I mean as fans, we carry on this kill or be killed attitude, but as institutions, there is nothing that one can hold over the other’s head.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

mayve, but that really seems to be a stretch.....it might hold for in-state recruiting,

but out of state is everyone’s game. And let’s face it, in-state recruiting here is not setting the world on fire. For either of us.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

UK has a good thing

why would they want to let another in-state institution, especially their prime rival in-state join? There are no upsides at all for them and plenty of downsides. Recruiting edge gone, being the top dog because of conf. affiliation, gone. Probably an ensuing loss of fan support going forward. After all, if your rival is in the same conf. and puts a better product on the field, kids coming up now are likely to jump ship and join the “enemy’s” camp.

by CardsRuleBE on Sep 20, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

well now, that is a pretty big jump......

assuming that inclusion into the SEC gives you all of that.

Please do not confuse the ruse that UK calls football with the reality that at UK it is about basketball, and they will take their football checks straight to the bank.

Just because you add the SEC logo to a school’s brand, does not make you better. It gives you more bargaining power, but I think some of your assumptions are making a really big leap.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is 100% true. I just can't see us keeping you out for that reason.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

GCA, come on man.......

It will be a good thing for the school as a whole, and it’s not going to hurt basketball any more than these defections from the BE already have.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sadly, I agree with this

If the Big East wasn’t losing members, I would not support an SEC move. But considering what we’re being left with in staying will be the have nots from the Big East and Big 12 and who knows if that becomes stable or not. I’d rather have the SEC where I know it’ll be stable.

No matter what, I’m not happy. I love football, but I hate that basketball has to suffer in favor of a sport that doesn’t have a playoff system.

Louisville still beat Kentucky. This bullshit won’t let me forget that.

#TransferChickenToTheBucket.

by noobmaster on Sep 20, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

You've gotta think about it logically, which really can't be done for some people

Membership into the SEC gives Charlie and his staff exponentially more clout on the recruiting trail.
Where would you rather live if you were a kid who wanted to play in the SEC?
Louisville, of Fayetteville?
Ask Bobby Petrino what he thinks about that, I hear he hates it there.

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dont necessarily deny that, but I dont think that either school in this case

holds a significant advantage over the other. At least not when you look at the results,

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're saying that being in the SEC doesn't help UK, right?

That doesn’t mean being in the SEC won’t help Louisville. Louisville has a history of recruiting in SEC country. Yes, it may be mostly Florida & Georgia leftovers but that could change if Louisville is part of the SEC. You can’t say that b/c UK doesn’t use SEC to their advantage that UofL won’t. UofL is already competing at UK’s level (or better) and they’re in a far less competitive football market.

by UL is my hot hot sex on Sep 20, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually what I am trying to say is this.

Being in the SEC has not helped UK Football other than monetarily. And until UK makes the commitment to football, it does not matter where they play.

UL may very well be able to do just that, but as of now, our keeping you out of the SEC as a reason to prevent all of that is just not sound thinking

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

no argument here.......lol

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let me ask you a question.

You are a big time college football prospect. You are looking to go to a Div1 School. Is UL or UK your target, unless you have close ties to that school, like family, or fanhhood since a boy, etc.?

I dont really think so. We do not get the prime targets unless other schools pass, and truthfully, you guys dont get them either. recruiting services rank our recruiting and yours about the same year after year, so I dont give that too much weight.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe so, but if Teddy Bridgewater was big time QB material, he would be playing

at Florida, Texas, Ohio State, USC, etc. The best recruits do not come to this state for football unless they were not recruited elsewhere

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree with this statement.

“Big time” recruits are well aware that they can play anywhere and still see the NFL. They are, as evidenced by the recent events involving basketball players, starting to give more and more weight to relationships with coaches and their staff. Sure, it would be nice to play for Auburn and win a NC; which is why the majority DO go there, but a lot of talent is just looking for a stage to showcase their talent, be adored by the fans and move on up.
IMO.

by David Lyons on Sep 20, 2011 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

fair enough.....my assessment is based on historical evidence not necessarilty

just recent activity.

But there is one thing I will say about this. Over at MrSEC.com they point out that all of this realignment is about 10-20 years from now. Not about now.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very true

These superconferences want to “lock in” success at expense of everyone else.

by TriviaGeek on Sep 20, 2011 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Closer to ten, but you are correct.

The thing is, these new ‘super’ conferences will ultimately be a mistake. Legal issues aside (but not gently aside, as they will loom huge in all of this), who wants to be the forgotten stud in a superconference when you were a top dog in a BCS eligible conference? I think a break down will come soon after the consolidation of these conferences occurs. Possibly within ten years.

by David Lyons on Sep 20, 2011 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some experts claim, and I myself tend to agree to a certain extent, that these moves are more

about breaking up the NCAA than anything else, other than the money

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Will not happen/ can not happen...but would love to see it.

For one thing, there HAS to be a main governing body for all these schools or we will be looking at recruitment armageddon in terms of violations. The NCAA can’t keep up even now. College football would de-evolute into a joke. Many programs would drop football althogether because they can’t compete $$$ wise.

by David Lyons on Sep 20, 2011 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, there are a lot of factors that stand against it.

I only hold out hope because 20 years ago, none of this would have even been thought of.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Greg, do this for me.

Look up the history of college football at the very beginning. There are fasinating books all over the place on it. Walter Camp was a crooked man. He did exactly what is going on today; right now at this moment. Just, of course, on a smaller scale.

by David Lyons on Sep 20, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Camp was probably the Godfather of it all.....

if he had known what it would become, he might have even gone farther than he did.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

he also would have loved the internet I believe.....

it would have been a major tool for him in getting his ideas out

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you serious Greg?

He was recruited heavily by LSU, Florida and Tenn,…. along with Miami
Get the fuck outta here man.
That’s that bullshit I be talkin about right there,…. with respect to you making backhanded comments.
IF TB was big time QB material….. IF?

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I am not singling out UL here

UK is in the same boat.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is not about UL Hate.......it's not about UK Hate....

its about these “superconferences” and those in power, and their “vision” of what those will be…….

Fanhood aside, it’s all about $$$, TV, and power.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are not seeing this clearly Chuck.....

I hold no grudge in keeping UL out. But this thing is bigger than UL and UK. Much bigger.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Number 2 scambling QB. He was up there regardless. Let's not forget he was a 5*

I don’t know many 5* players that get looked over.

You read all the time about kids wanting to play in the SEC because of the style of play. Being in the SEC gives you one more thing to sell while recruiting. I don’t think UL will ever recruit like Florida, Alabama, LSU but the talent level would go up guaranteed (hell we are scratching the surface with our current players).

-Dustin

by Civicman86 on Sep 20, 2011 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look, I am not saying that some kids dont break with historicals.

I am saying that for the most part, it just doesnt happen. How many NC’s do we have between us in football?

How many Heisman Candidates?

As a rule, they do not come to UK or UL

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

It wasn't my intent to rile anyone......I apologize for doing that.

I am simply looking at the overall picture and the flawed theory that this guy presents.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey, I am not denying the emotions tied to it all....

but the ties are just that, emotional. People are not looking at this from the “overall”.

We need to pull our collective heads out of our backsides and look at what is best long term, and what the repercussions of decisions will be before they are made.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

UK's best interest in the long-term would be to protect Louisville

from falling back. We are a “winnable” game in football and improve your BB resume allowing you to schedule either another elite program or a cupcake depending on your mood. UK knows this. They are just sticking to the party line at this point in the SEC. UK offering up UofL as a candidate is an admission to being the weakest party in the “gentleman’s agreement” and it forces the UK admin to take a PR hit. If it stays at 14, no way does UK fold. At 16, I think they do.

by Remote Cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

probably closer to the truth than anyone wants to admit

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am a UK fan, but I call bullshit when I see it.

Kiel is the best QB in the class next year. Recruited by Alabama, Notre Dame, Oregon, Wisconsin, USC, Oklahoma, etc.

But he is going to Indiana.

by mrmondaynite on Sep 21, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

This.

Plus the status of being in a more elite conference than UofL.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Elite" conference status usually means something to those at the top......

at the bottom the view is all the same. Until the overall records between the two schools make a large swing, it really holds no meaning for UK. Yes, the fans dangle that carrot in the faces of UL fans, but for the schools it is solely about $$ and TV appearances.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well

I can’t figure out what monetary harm it does UK for us to be in the same conference. So I don’t know what else it would be.

by Jason G on Sep 20, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dont think there is anything.......

the “monetary” harm is negligible. As long as contracts get adjusted, which they obviously will, then it is simply a matter of checking the math. Some might argue that this puts UK consistent bowl attendance of late in jeopardy, but adding Louisville will not do that. What will do that is UK not making a real commitment to football.

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe the opposite would be true

If Louisville joins the SEC< Kentucky will be obliged to make a real commitment to football, rather than using football money to underwrite the non-revenue sports (so basketball doesn’t have to).

If UK doesn’t have the “We’re SEC and you’re not” excuse anymore they’ll be pressured to make a serious effort on the field.

by TriviaGeek on Sep 20, 2011 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would love to see it, I just dont hold out a lot of hope anymore

I am now and shall forever be the Cat in The Hat, The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!!!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 20, 2011 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree, UK loves rubbing it in our face they are in the SEC and we are not. As much as it would be nice to be in such a secure conference, I don’t see any way UK lets us in, they don’t want us on the same level as them.

by CardDog23 on Sep 20, 2011 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again with the SEC crap???

And again, I just threw up in mouth a little.

"There is no OFF position to the genius switch" - D. Letterman

by GrogInOhio on Sep 20, 2011 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Screw who we play, Screw what the league is called, Screw how easy the FB or BB path to a title is...

just get in a stable conference where a path to the title still exists. This means a BCS conference. Period.

I don’t think any form of the Big Tweast is stable. It’s shaky until the microsecond that any of these 12-man or 14-man conferences decide to go to 16 teams, then it complete disintegrates on contact.

There will be either four 16-team conferences or five 12 to 14 team conferences. If there are only 4 conferences and you are left out, you will fall to obscurity and fast. If there are five conferences, I’ll personally guarantee that the Big Tweast would be the worst of the 5 in every perception imaginable nationally, both in football and in basketball, deserved or not. It will have the worst TV revenue situation. It will be the toughest to recruit to. It will always be under threat of destruction if any of the other 12-team or 14-teams conferences want to try expansion to 16 teams.

The Big Tweast will, in general, be the worst possible option other than being on the outside looking in at the 4 super conferences. And honestly, that worst case will always be a threat.

by Remote Cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 5:17 PM EDT reply actions  

According to what I've read

Oklahoma will stay in the Big 12 pending several reforms, most notably:

Conference commissioner Dan Beebe resigns and Texas is forced to share revenue from the LHN

by Cool Hand Cards on Sep 20, 2011 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

How long will Oklahoma stay in the Big 12?

Boren has been pulling a Mizzou over the PAC-1? forever. He wants access to their academics and athletics quite badly. As soon as the opportunity arises, Oklahoma will be gone, probably taking Oklahoma State with them. That might be today, or in several years, but it will happen.

Texas, though, might be willing to stay. Texas considers the Longhorns Network as critical to UT’s athletics. If a deal cannot be reached with the PAC-16, they might choose to stay in a Big 12 where they have a lot of power. Any concessions on the LHN, much less than what the PAC-16 would want, would benefit UL football. I am sure we can get some access on basketball too. That would be a win-win for Texas and the Ville.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

i’m with you on this one.

Mack Brown had some pretty strong statements about the effect joining a non-regional conference would have on recruiting due to the ability of family to attend games, etc.

by Antiorb on Sep 20, 2011 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

If coaches had a say in things, then Syracuse will be still be in the Big East.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possibly? To me, it looks like Texas and Oklahoma have been trying to stay together and bolt to the PAC-12.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or maybe OU and Texas Split

OU and Texas have gotten the green light to leave for the PAC-12. The question is who goes and who does not? The conventional wisdom is that Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, and Texas Tech will form the PAC-16. The LHN is a major stumbling block in this process. Of course, the LHN is a major stumbling block for OU staying in the Big 12. And the LHN was a stumbling block for Texas going to the SEC.

Texas might prefer to keep it’s LHN as strong as possible. That could easily create a situation where OU and OSU join the PAC-14. Texas would stay in the Big 12.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Texas is not going to share money from their network. If they do that they are going to the PAC-12 guaranteed.

-Dustin

by Civicman86 on Sep 20, 2011 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

If Texas is willing to concede on the LHN, then UT is going to the PAC-16.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Mizzou does bolt to the SEC, then the Big12 would need 3 more teams to get back to 12

Louisville
TCU
and pretty much anybody else would be better than what the had before Colorado, Nebraska, and Mizzou left in the first place.
For football and Basketball

by Chick-Stratino'sUrDaddy on Sep 20, 2011 6:19 PM EDT reply actions  

They'd go

WVU then Cincy then USF (imo)

by Remote Cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 6:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why USF last?

USF is a huge school with a lot of future potential. UC brings an old rivalry game, but not much else. I would say USF, then WVU, then UC.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just my opinion

and it makes the assumption that TCU and Louisville are already there.

WVU might be taken. Cincy is a WAAAAY better geography fit than USF. I know that has little or none to do with it, but just what I thought.

by Remote Cardinal on Sep 20, 2011 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just my opinion

In that case, I would take WVU, UL, and TCU. I hate to leave Cincy behind a la Brian Kelly, but WVU makes more sense in football and basketball right now.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don't forget recruiting

One of the best things about USF being in the Big East was exposure in Florida (for all BE schools).

by UL is my hot hot sex on Sep 23, 2011 5:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Big TWeast with East Coast Bball

My Version of The Big TWeast, aka the ACC will not kill off Big East bball as easily as they think.

Here is my proposal for the Big TWeast

Basketball

Cincy, Louisville, USF, Villanova, (Missouri and/or West Virginia pending the SEC), Baylor, Iowa State Kansas, Kansas State, DePaul, Georgetown, Marquette, Notre Dame, Providence, St. John’s, Seton Hall, (UCF or FIU for the Florida market), SMU, Houston, Eastern Carolina.

That leaves the conference with 20 schools in basketball. Not quite as good as the ACC right now, or even arguably the old Big East, but this could be the second best basketball conference around given the recent mediocrity of the PAC-12, B1G, and the always basketball poor SEC.

Perhaps we could even “trade” some of the basketball only schools. Say Providence and Seton Hall for Xavier and Richmond or George Mason and VCU. Possibly some combination of the two.

This plan would allow us to keep the NYC and D.C. recruiting areas open for UofL and the rest of the old BE football schools, while possibly adding some recruiting areas in Florida, Virginia and North Carolina, i.e. the ACC’s backyard, as well as Texas.

The Big East bball tournament could still use MSG, while possibly adding Greensboro, N.C., when the ACC is not using it, to our rotation. (Assuming that the ACC will add MSG to their rotation.) As I am biased, Louisville could be added to that list, along with Houston.
  
As a side note, the volunteers of the Derby City Classic have done a phenomenal job for a very long time, but it is time that we add a corporate sponsor to that event. Either Adidas or Under Armour. That would help out Big East, specifically UL, recruiting a lot.

Football

Cincy, Louisville, So. Florida, TCU, Villanova, (Missouri and/or West Virginia pending the SEC), Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, (UCF or FIU for the Florida market), SMU, Houston, Eastern Carolina.

That leaves us with 14 football teams, assuming that either Mizzou or West Virginia jump ship to the SEC. (If Mizzou goes to the B1G, then UL probably goes to the ACC.) This conference might actually be stronger in football than the old Big East. At the very least, it should be enough to retain BCS AQ status.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Possibly, but Georgetown, Villanova, Notre Dame, and Marquette still had bball value. What if we split with the BE entirely and the BE basketball schools merge with the Atlantic 10. That would be a hell of a bball conference.

But, I see your point too.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 6:44 PM EDT reply actions  

It isn't, but one wonders if, once the football cartels have divided the country, they will turn their attention to basketball.

It is a several-billion dollar industry after all. It seems almost as if conferences will be formed for each sporting event and eventually each university’s athletic programs will belong to one of several conferences for that particular sport.

by centre_card on Sep 20, 2011 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting idea. Maybe everyone should just be independent and have multiple year home and home contracts with other schools.

We give conference affiliation the ultimate middle finger and burn the industry down. Make half of your schedule home and home on 6 year contracts and leave the rest to be decided on a yearly basis.

Completely insane, and way too dynamic to work, but hey.

by James Sutherland on Sep 20, 2011 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Among the B1G, PAC-12, and SEC, I agree, but the ACC?

Basketball is not driving expansion for the PAC-12 (football), B1G (academics and football), or SEC (football). But how do you explain the ACC? There has been more than some grumbling among radio anouncers and fans here in Tallahassee that the ACC has decided to focus SOLELY on basketball while ignoring football. (I doubt that Spetman is taking us out of the ACC, though.) You can make an historical argument that Syracuse and Pitt were good in football, but neither school has been relevant in a long time. Same is true for Rutgers, although the historical argument is a bit harder to make in that case. Of course the football argument will fail completely if UCONN is added.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Football value isn't really driving this mess either at this point. Fear is.

Louisville has to look out for basketball and football. A move that is slightly better in football and much worse in basketball is still a net loss for the school. There needs to be some more “out of the box” thinking for UofL.

by cardgrad on Sep 21, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Over at the UCONN blog it's being reported that

the school president and AD will not be in attendance at tonight’s meeting in NYC. The president is sending her chief of staff and they are sending the ‘acting’ athletic director instead of the ‘interim’ director. Bye, Huskies.

by centre_card on Sep 20, 2011 7:12 PM EDT reply actions  

I've decided to be more reasonable.

I had a HUGE problem with going to the SEC. I think because I decided to keep my head in the sand & tell myself the Big East would be fine. But it’s obviously not, so things will most likely change.

 My SEC problem was all about basketball. But I’ve realized that no conference will compare to what the BE was in basketball. I think BE style of play is more fun to watch, and I think the teams make each other better. For example I can’t stand UCONN but our teams have been better after playing them. I don’t see that in any other conference. Maybe we’ll end up somewhere with other BE teams & we will make the conference better. Yeah, I’m that confident in the Cards.

Thanks to you guys I am willing to be open-minded, even though I know we would have to endure boring basketball in the SEC. But if it’s best for UL I’m good.

by Cards78 on Sep 20, 2011 8:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm thinking they haven't officially invited but they have a "gentlemen's agreement"

They’re saying they haven’t invited anyone since Arkansas and South Carolina. Which means they didn’t invite A&M, they just let it be known to the powers that be at A&M that they would look favorably on an application. Semantics.

"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by rickmbari on Sep 21, 2011 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

This evenings thoughts

Didn’t the SEC deny they gave TX A&M an invitation at first? My guess is Mizz is heading to the SEC if Big 12 falls apart. From what I have read they seem some what interested in salvaging the Big12 but seems like TX and OK have a lot of issues to work out and they might not want to wait around too long. Kind of shocked WVU wsa denied by both the SEC and ACC, I figured they would get picked up by one of the conf but this is good for us.

Personally my favorite scenario would be to go to the ACC with UConn but I still don’t see that happening. My second favorite scenario would be ACC takes UConn and Rutgers, the nine teams in the Big 12 stay together and add Louisville, Cincy, TCU, WVU and USF giving them a 14 team conference. The scenario I think is most realistic today is Big 12 implodes with theTX and OK schools heading to Pac 16 and Mizz to SEC then UConn and Rutgers go to ACC and we are in a league with Kansas, K-State, Iowa St, Baylor, TCU, Cincy, WVU, USF and maybe pick up 1 – 3 other schools like Memphis, Houston and SMU.

by CardDog23 on Sep 20, 2011 9:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Missouri

Most lilkely scenario regarding Missouri is that the SEC offered them an invitation. Mizzou is currently working on one last ditch effort to join the B1G, which is where they really want to be. (That deal could involve Rutgers or Kansas.) If that last ditch effort fails, then Mizzou heads to the SEC.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 11:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Big 12

Oklahoma and Texas have some issues to work out over the LHN. If Texas wishes to join the PAC-1?, then there are some issues to work out over the LHN. Remember that Texas and the LHN started this recent round of realignment by essentially pushing Nebraska, Colorado, and Texas A&M out the door over the LHN. LHN aside, Boren and Oklahoma really wants to be in the PAC-1? for acadmics. I think that Oklahoma is pretty much gone to the PAC-1? with an invitaiton.Texas is more divided over that move. I am not so sure that Texas wants to leave with them.

With that said, there are really two scenarios for the Big 12 that are likely.
1.) The Mad Exodus: Texas will make concessions over the LHN network and works out a deal with the PAC-12 over the LHN. In that case,Texas, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, and Oklahoma State all leave. The likely result is the Big TWeast with Louisville inlcuded. Assuming that Louisville does not somehow work out a deal to join the SEC.
2.) Big 12 2.0 Reboot: Texas is not willing to make concessions over the LHN. Texas then gets the best of both worlds by essentially being a football independent while belonging to a conference. In this scenario, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State bolt for the PAC-14. Missouri would definitely jump at a chance to join the B1G, but would be less likely to jump to the SEC. The Big 12 adds four new schools to get their number back up to 12. (Which would also make their name much less ironic.) Those four schools would likely be Louisville, West Virginia, TCU, and one of the following (Houston, Rice, SMU).

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 11:36 PM EDT reply actions  

If Missouri stays, then the Houston, Rice, SMU group falls out.

by cardgrad on Sep 20, 2011 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Card Chronicle, the Louisville sports blog Otis George might read if he knew it existed.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Whiteout_small
The Cardinal Countdown...99 days till kickoff
Whiteout_small
100 Days....
Small
Tim Higgins is retiring
313364_2222722366459_1199700380_32210649_1027867481_n_small
Neutral Zone's Memorial Day Sale
Small
2012-13 Schedule
Blkcrd_small
Defining Moments of a Fanhood; The Vote-Off
Small
Francisco Garcia Wallpaper/Illustration
Whiteout_small
The Lady Cards nine...
Strongbasketball_small
Louisville should take note of new SEC-Big 12 bowl
Small
Michael Bush Illustration/Wallpaper (typo fixed)

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Admm_small Mike Rutherford