Analyzing the Belk Bowl
After another 7-6 season, one that at this point I will gladly accept, the Louisville Cardinals are getting back from the Belk Bowl after a crushing 31-24 loss. After the wheels appeared to be coming off early in the second half, the Cards made a comeback but came up just short.
We'll start with the good from the game.
Heart- No doubt about it, each and every one of these players has some true heart, maybe not as much as the basketball team, but regardless, after being manhandled to say the least early on, the entire team bounced back and almost pulled victory out of the jaws of defeat.
Teddy Bridgewater - A turnover and a sack that was basically a turnover with no return did not faze him. He did look a little bit rattled in the second half but calmed down and and really did well against the NC State defense. With the amount of hits that he took ( we should have gotten roughing on a few of them ), the fact that he stayed in the game hurt, and perormed the way he did deserves a say.
Josh Bleser - The kicks weren't pretty, but he pinned the Pack inside their own fifteen twice, and he executed the first onside kick perfectly. I thought the second was also very gettable, but NC State may have seen tape of Bleser's kicks. He loves to hit that dribbler right up the middle. It worked against Pitt, but has not most other times. Two very nice kicks though. Nice way for a senior to exit.
Victor Anderson - Brings back memories to freshman Vic, the way he ran behind the crappy offensive line and made cut after great cut and turned the plays up the field. Best of luck to him as he moves on.
Josh Bellamy - If only he was this good all season, maybe it has something to do with the absence of Michaelee Harris. 98 yards and a TD are good numbers.
Special Teams- We got basically a blocked kick, an onside kick recovery, a field goal, 60 yard kick return, and a faked punt. Great playcalling on special teams, whoever does call the plays for that area of the team.
Now for the bad...
Playcalling- A dive on 4th and 1 has not worked in the 1st quarter, did not work in the 2nd nor the third, and we run it on a drive where, out of the last three, was either the best or second best opportunity to score. Play action would catch them off guard and could pick up a big gain. Add in that we ran some really conservative plays at some really bad times, and that was a recipe for disaster.
Defensive Backs- Give them credit for really coming back strong in the second half, but they got Hilton'd in the first half, there's just no way around it, they did very poorly in the tackling department, and when TJ Graham put NC State up 21-10, I really, really thought that it resembled the second TY Hilton touchdown, except this one was worse because we missed 3 tackles and a fourth guy could have saved the touchdown. The unit definitely stepped up in the second half.
Defensive Line- These guys, who were probably the only guys who could stop Glennon in the first half with the DBs making him look like Brett Favre, were absolutely nonexistent on passing plays. I don't thin we had more than one or two sacks. The thing that ticked me off, as one commentor pointed out in the open thread, is that there was seriously a lack of effort in trying to get to the quarterack. There was no one bullrushing, or spining, ripping, or swimming to get to the QB. It was like they were basically occupying linemen.
1st half defensive coaching- Not a fan of what we were doing when they were at first hurting us with intermediate throws- blitzing. That means those TEs are going to be open and we played quite a bit of man coverage at bad times, especially with recievers going through the middle of the field. Did well later on though.
And finally, the Kragthorpian.
Refs - I don't think there was any bias, but that was one of the worst shows of incompetence that I have ever seen. Let's count the amazing calls by the refs.
- Preston Brown personal foul. Totally got hosed here. Preston was holding the guy up, and usually, personal fouls are when someone maliciously lights you up. Cost us three points.
- I thought they could have called a few roughing the passers on NC State. Those were some malicious hits. Felt like watching the VIkings-Saints game in the NFC Championship where the refs and his offensive line just allowed Brett Favre to be abused the whole game. Same happened here.
- At least two missed pass interference calls that were blatent.
- Saying that Ted stepped OUT OF BOUNDS on the second down play on our second to last drive. He was not out, the refs did not review, and DID NOT STOP THE CLOCK! How stupid to you have to be to not notice that? If he was out (he wasn't) he would have been out under his own power (he was rolling out for God's sakes), he was not pulled backwards, tackled out, or pulled down. Cost us 12 yards and over a minute of time.
I mean, refs weren't why we lost, but they were AWFUL. Really disappointed that this is the bitter taste that stays around for another nine months, because I know that we are a better team than that. Regardless, go Cards, beat UK in basketball and the next football game.
59 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I can honestly say I'm not disappointed with the outcome.
Yes, a win would have been great, but making it to a bowl game was the goal as far as I was concerned, and we did. We even gave them hell after falling behind 21 points. And Teddy… what to say about Teddy…
I was getting emotional at the end of the game. The insanity of hits that kid took behind a faltering offensive line was only matched by his will to keep moving. By the end of the game there was hardly any white on that jersey. He was limping, holding his shoulder and hand, and it looked like his ability to rotate on his hips was severely hampered, but he still stayed out there and gave it his all. I can’t express how proud I was of him. Nevermind the INTs, he played his heart out and I am ECSTATIC thinking about the next few years with this kid.
by Justin Gingey Smith on Dec 28, 2011 11:50 AM EST reply actions
I agree...
This season started with minimum expectations and a lower half finish in the BE. Instead we finish with a portion of the league title and go bowling for the 2nd straight year. HCCS is the man and there’s no coach I’d rather have on our sideline.
Teddy reminded me of Cantwell in the Gator Bowl, he was getting blasted. But showed just how tough he is. I think the 1st INT was the only blatant mistake. The 2nd should have been prevented with more effort from Rogers and the last was a hail mary on 4th and a mile.
Can’t wait for next season…Go Cards!
Bridgewater made a believer of me!
I just wanted to chime in as an NC State Fan and a former D-1 football player at Furman who watched the game last night. I was very impressed with Bridgewater. That kid is talented and tough and made a fan of me. I can’t say that I am not happy with the outcome because I am proud of the way my young Wolfpack bounced back from so much adversity this season and this win was a nice reward for their efforts. But you guys have a very bright future ahead of you and I wish nothing but the best for Charlie Strong and your young football program.
Much respect, and right back at you.
Was difficult to watch 4 quarters of Bridgewater and not fall in love to some extent. If not because of his talent, because of his true grit.
by Justin Gingey Smith on Dec 28, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
Don't forget O-line.
Main reason Teddy kept getting hit and why we couldn’t get anywhere on 4th down.
Refs were bad, but I don’t think they missed any roughing the passer calls. I thought they were all legit. Teddy was holding onto the ball until the last possible second.
Speaking of which, holy crap Teddy took a beating. Teddy definitely played his balls off.
I disagree on the refs
I think that several of those hits on Teddy could have been called. Yes, he was holding the ball till the last second, but at some point they need to step up and protect the QB. He was getting hit from every angle, and at least once was hit a second time on the way to the ground.
The O-line takes most of the blame for letting him get hit so much, but the refs swallowed their whistles several times they could have easily called roughing the passer.
That said, the refs didn’t cost us the game, but they definitely changed the momentum several times with the calls they did make.
by regis villebin on Dec 28, 2011 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
That's what I saw.
Trust me, every time they showed a replay of him getting hit, I was looking to see if it was late. Some were vicious, but they were all legal plays.
by CardinalDude on Dec 28, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
THE FUTURE!
How bright is the future of this team!?!?! I mean most of our talent our freshman or sophomores. We have the best coach in the country in my opinion, and will continue to recruit 4+ star athletes! I predict a 9-10 win season next year, and a BCS birth the following year. Also if Teddy stays healthy and continues to develop he will be a Heisman candidate by his junior or senior season. Hold your heads up high, the sky is the limit!!!
Let me add that our secondary gave up lots of short underneath passes that went for 8+ yard gains and lots of 1st downs.
Don’t understand why our corners play soft on a team that uses these short passes instead of a running game. If you just give them that 6-8 yd reception, it is far to easy to march all the way down the field getting one first down after another. And we have done that all year long. 12 of their 16 non penalty first downs came by the pass and many of those were those underneath and short routes, and for most of those plays, the receiver was wide open. For long stretches they had no running game, and for us to just give them that easy short pass makes no sense at all. A few stops could have made a big difference in the outcome.
by Carolina Cardinal on Dec 28, 2011 12:11 PM EST reply actions
You can tell that NC State
Watched a lot of the Pitt game tape, because that is what Pitt did the whole game and it worked great against us. Just like against Pitt we started to get a better handle on it after 15 or so plays, but by that time they had 7 up on the board and working towards more.
Slipping
It seemed like the entire game we were slipping like crazy on both sides of the ball, so after the game I chatted up Eli Rogers and he told me that they all got brand new cleats that had a weird design and there was no way for them to change the length of the spikes in them
by Cardinal crunch on Dec 28, 2011 12:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Doesn't seem to smart to try out new footgear in a big game without prior testing first.
by Carolina Cardinal on Dec 28, 2011 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
oregon did the same thing last year and also had problens with grip.
I’m sure there is some sort of logic, but seems like a very risky to change and cost us at least 7 maybe 14.
-Dustin
by Civicman86 on Dec 28, 2011 7:59 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
The end of the first half really hurt
A spot on analysis, but I would add the stalled offensive drive followed by a quick NC State score at the end of the first half was a dagger. The whole team came out in the second half and played their hearts out, but it was just too much to overcome.
by JohnTongEchoesinmyhead on Dec 28, 2011 12:23 PM EST reply actions
Proud of the team and 7-6 this season was harder to achieve than 7-6 last year.
- Disappointed in the Wildcard when we were driving in the redzone. I don’t know why they always do that when we get in the redzone.
- Lack of Brown running the ball on 3rd and short. I don’t know if Strong was letting VA get the bulk of the carries since he was a senior, but let Brown get the ball when it’s going up the middle.
- Where has that Bellamy been all season?
- Proud of the team in the 2nd half, especially the defense after the first NCST drive where they thought they were going to get off the field on multiple occasions.
- Can’t wait for the future.
Agree with you
That wildcard play hasn’t been successful enough to warrant using in that situation.
I also was flabbergasted with several red zone opportunities, or short down opportunities, where they elected to throw the ball rather than let VA or DB rumble the 2-3 yards for a first down. And the receivers invariably dropped the passes, ending up with the offense having to punt.
I agree Bellamy was a ghost this season. He’d have like one big catch a game, and then disappear completely.
I also thought that Chichester was sorely underused this year. He’s actually one of the better receiving tight ends in the league, but they rarely used him to that effect. He only had 1 completion and 2 attempts in the entire game!!
by regis villebin on Dec 28, 2011 2:21 PM EST up reply actions
Chichester
Has a tendency to not catch balls thrown at him
No more than any other receiver on the team.
Everyone seems to make more out of his drops than anyone elses, with maybe Rogers being the exception. He isn’t a bad pass catcher. A lot of people seem to think because he’s tall, he should automatically catch every pass thrown within 5 yards of him.
A lot of times he’s under single or double coverage when the ball is thrown to him, and many times its been thrown behind him. Some of the other guys, like Parker and Harris, can make that kind of catch because they’re more athletic.
If they ran more plays designed to run him across the middle for a 6-10 yard gain, I think he’d have much better receiving numbers, and people wouldn’t be so down on him. Coaches just haven’t seemed to really know what to do with him.
by regis villebin on Dec 28, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
Chichester
He only catches the ball if it is a foot aeay from him because it looks like he can’t extend his arms out
by Cardinal crunch on Dec 28, 2011 3:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
OL was TERRIBLE.
I was honestly scared Teddy was going to get hurt bad.
NCST defense was a lot better
The pick six was the difference in the game and they pressured the quarterback. I hope our guys can improve. We need better talent. The Cards were over achievers this year. This game was tough to
watch. Young guys and a long layoff is not a recipe for success. Tell me again, why can’t there be a playoff system?
Overachievers...
This team was young, but is very talented. They overachieved in the sense they are young, not that their talent sucks.
Louisville Cardinals
Governors Cup Champions 2011-3011
by HorsePig55 on Dec 28, 2011 1:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Charlie said it in his post game interview with Paul Rogers
He said we need better players. I agree with his assessment. We need more talent. NCST defense was the difference in the game. Eli Rogers should have made a play for the ball. It cost us six points. The defense is a weak point and we are thin there = need more talent.
I disagree on the Rogers point
Making a play for the ball is something that comes from experience, not just talent. Rogers has the potential to be a good playmaker for the Cards, he’s just showed more inexperience (and maybe a lower base talent) than DeVante Parker or Michealee Harris have.
I agree, we do need more talent, but I don’t think you can dismiss that talent that is already on the team. Its just talent that needs more experience before it can make all of the plays it needs to make.
by regis villebin on Dec 28, 2011 2:18 PM EST up reply actions
What I don't understand about that pick six
is why it wasn’t pass interference. I know the defender has a right to make a play on the ball, but does he have the right to impede the intended receiver in doing so? It looked to me, both live and on the Jumbotron replay, like the guy was al over Eli’s back.
"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino
Like Charlie said, if Eli had gone up after the ball with his body, would have been PI.
Instead he let the guy jump over him. Didn’t look like over the back cause he went up, not up and forward.
by CardinalDude on Dec 29, 2011 1:01 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think you have to worry about beating UK in the next football game
Unless you’re worried about Joker out-recruiting us while we were distracted by something as inconvenient as a bowl game.
Next year will be akin to the days of old. We will not lose to teams we’re supposed to beat, and will give the good teams we play hell. Looking forward to next season.
________________________________________________
www.lordkayoss.com
by LORD KAYOSS on Dec 28, 2011 2:09 PM EST via mobile reply actions
HorsePigManBear siting on the front page!
Good post. Thanks for the wise words. Now I’m not nearly as depressed as I was last night.
Dom vs. Vic
Why was Vic carrying on the late 4th and 1 plays instead of Dom? Dom outweighs him almost 30 pounds and that can make a big, big diff in short yardage.
Strong letting the seniors play?
I have no clue. VA was playing well though
Winning the game vs. letting seniors play is just wrong.
If I where a senior I would much rather go out winning than risk losing the game for my guys.
I highly doubt that's what was going on.
If you take out Dom’s big run, Vic was by far the most effective back.
Remember the Beef Bowl!
No way HCCS or his staff puts seniors' egos above the game outcome
The plays that were called, were called because they were thought to be the best option. I disagreed with a lot of the calls, but nobody was favoring Vic because he’s a senior.
"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino
Both Vic and Dom had a shot at 4th & 1 plays
Bad blocking—mostly by the Tight End—was more to blame, as many others have already pointed out.
Vic was hitting the hole pretty hard through the first three quarters. After hard runs of 14 and 3 yards to put the Cards on the 1 yard line late in the 3rd Quarter, Vic missed a read on his ensuing 2nd & goal run and was taken out of the game for the next play where Teddy hit Nord for a TD in the corner of the end zone. The camera caught him kneeling on the sideline shaking his head as a teammate consoled him right before the TD play.
During the last 30 Louisville offensive plays after his failed 2nd & 1 run in the red zone, Anderson ran for just 10 yards on 4 rushes, including the failed 4th & 1 from the I formation, which developed similar to Dom’s failed 4th & 1 in the 2nd quarter. Dom only got one carry in the L30 offensive possessions, which he took for a 3 yard gain. Obviously UofL had to throw the ball more given the score and time remaining, but Vic looked like a different player after that 2nd and 1 (goal) run.
by UL is my hot hot sex on Dec 28, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
We got away with some calls too
The one “catch” where the receiver never even thought about having possession of the ball and it ended up between his ankles. We snapped it before it could be reviewed, but that was a lack of quality officiating as well.
Agree on the one play where they said Teddy went out of bounds. Either way, the clock should have stopped. It was an incomplete pass for one and we all knew that, but if he went out of bounds, the clock should have stopped. To top it off, the ref told them to re-start the clock after setting the ball. Ref’s didn’t cost us the game though. Interceptions and dropped passes and STUPID play-calling on 4th and one did.
GO! CARDS!
BEAT!
PURDUE!
Agreed, the refs did not cost us that game, but did anyone notice in the first quarter on a consistent basis NCState jumping the gun and not getting called for it? That can be really demoralizing for a D Line to have to try to get past an O-line which already established itself before the ball moves. Just my thoughts, but it was nice to see some of the false starts get called later in the game.
The future is bright my friends. Go Cards!
If you are going to call out the refs on the step out
you need to call out the coaches for not getting that to review. The clock management was baffling the last 4 minutes. Calling a timeout on a dead ball is still baffling.
Anybody else think we should have kicked deep instead of the second onsides kick?
If the defense stops them we have plenty of time for a final drive.
by Carolina Cardinal on Dec 28, 2011 5:48 PM EST reply actions
No argument there. But we have been a pretty good defensive team all year and Charlie seems the kind of coach who would pu this chips on his teams strength.
I will say that the way we were not covering their short passing game might have influenced his decision.
by Carolina Cardinal on Dec 28, 2011 6:16 PM EST up reply actions
I thought we would kick it away
but I can understand going for the onside kick; the way they were moving the ball on us, I felt they would have had a good chance to kill the clock.
"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino
i think our problem was the line on both sides constant pressure on one and none on the other and still have a chance to win is incredible
Lines were a problem but the key was letting them continually complete those short passes and then run for 6-10 yards.
They got 75% of their non penalty first downs by passing. Someone posted that they had 0 yards rushing in the first half. If we could have covered those underneath routes, we could have completely shut down their offense.
by Carolina Cardinal on Dec 28, 2011 6:19 PM EST up reply actions
Risking the ire of Carolina Card
I have to say that incompletions on first down hurt us. That leaves you in long yardage situations where you almost have to throw, and the defense knows it.
"...and the present, for us, is something that we really look forward to."
- Rick Pitino

by 












