Charlie Strong Press Conference Highlights
The C-J has the full video.

--Played well in all three phases of the game against UConn on Saturday. Very proud of the way his team prepared and focused.
--We held a team that had been running the ball very well to under 100 yards and six three-and-outs.
--Adrian Bushell gave us a huge boost on special teams, but he would have also returned the second kick for a score if he would have just followed his blockers.
--We're nowhere near where we should be right now. We're not really a good football team, and we know that.
--What we can't do as a program right now is to listen to all the bowl talk and the outside influences. South Florida is an outstanding team that's very good on defense. They're going to be a huge test.
--Tough to prepare for the USF offense right now since we don't know who's going to be playing quarterback.
--Knows we're right in the thick of the BCS bowl discussion, but doesn't want to address it because we're too young to handle all that stuff. Knows that some of the veterans are aware of it, but trusts them to keep the younger guys focused on the task at hand.
--Always told the team that they had the talent and could be great if they worked hard. Still, he's surprised at the position they're in right now.
--B.J. Daniels is a really good football player and you always want to face the best so you hope he can go. We'll prepare like we're going to have to face B.J. Daniels.
--The players get out of school on Tuesday, so we'll have some additional time to work on a short week. What hurts is the coaches miss that extra day to gameplan.
--We've played 10 straight weeks (since the bye before the UK game) so the guys are in a rhythm and totally locked in. Thinks that's an advantage, and is glad we haven't had a bye week since that could allow the guys to listen to some of those outside influences.
--Adrian Bushell is so talented, but he's his own worst enemy. He's probably the fastest player on the team. Obviously was huge on special teams, but he's also a guy who has really made plays on defense.
--The amazing thing about our players is they've answered the call every time we've asked someone to switch positions. Mentions Alex Kupper, Jake Smith, Jamon Brown, Chris White and Lorenzo Mauldin. Guy at ESPN told them we've had 14 guys who have played multiple positions. We definitely have a depth problem. We're talented, but obviously this shows that we're young.
--Roy Philon is battling a back issue, but he will play.
--We'll rotate a lot of guys on the defensive line since USF is so big and so many of our guys are banged up there.
--Adrian Bushell being his own worst enemy has to do with him not buying into the program. We have a system here, and we're not going to change. It doesn't matter how talented the player is. I once told him, "I'm not bigger than this program and a player will never be bigger than this program." He has so much talent, now it's up to him to buy into this program and take things to the next level. He can be as good as he wants to be.
--B.J. Butler will likely be a game time decision.
--Lenny Lyles was an icon. He was one of those players that didn't need the spotlight. This summer they brought back a bunch of former players. He brought Lenny downstairs to show him a mural he has featuring Lyles. Lenny saw it and was shocked. Asked Strong, "why'd you put me up there?" I said: "You deserve to be up there because of what you did for this program. He was a special person."
--Lyles was a role model for athletes here also because of what he did after leaving the program.
--Let the team know yesterday that we've never won at South Florida. Our average loss down there is more than 21 points. Some of the worst losses in program history have happened in Tampa.
--There have been a lot of firsts for the program this season, and this team needs to understand that. We haven't had back-to-back winning seasons since 2006, and this team has the opportunity to change that on Friday.
--Darius Ashley is going through a program right now, and he still comes by and checks in with coach Strong. When he gets himself right we'll talk about his status.
--Tells the guys who are natives from Florida that they're going to be having all sorts of people trying to hit them up for tickets. We can't allow that sort of stuff to happen. Your focus has to be on the game. I know you're from Florida and you want to play well in Florida, but this is about the program, it's not about you individually. We need everyone locked in on Friday.
--Both teams have a lot at stake here with them being one win away from bowl eligibility.
--He and Skip Holtz talk a lot. They were at South Carolina together and built a really solid relationship there. They're really good friends.
--Wishes he could call him and check on the status of B.J. Daniels.
--The USF front seven is very good, but we have to be able to run the football to keep the passing game out of the long-yardage situations. This is a huge test for our offensive line.
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think the biggest part of all this
is the fact that HCCS brought up Darius Ashley. I know personally I forgot all about him and didn’t expect him to return to the program but I’m glad to see Strong didn’t and still seems to have an open mind. Best of luck Darius.
Disagree with the last statement
Running the ball for little or no gain is exactly what outs is in a second and long situation, not the other way around. We average more than double the yardage on our short passing game (7+per attempt and 11 per completion ) than we do running the ball (3.4). And those swing passes and quick outs in the flat are near 100% completion rate, so that play usually gets us in the 6-9 yd range. That is what gets you into second and short.
In Charlie we trust, but the numbers are clear. We have a much better chance of getting to second and short by trowing than we do by running. And, please, I realize we cannot throw the ball all the time. But given Charlies comment about the strength of the USF front seven, I hope we don’t try to test the strongest part of their defense, with the weakest part of our offense. Just doesn’t seem smart.
by Carolina Cardinal on Nov 21, 2011 6:31 PM EST reply actions
Sorry fpr the spelling. Been a long day.
by Carolina Cardinal on Nov 21, 2011 6:33 PM EST up reply actions
I somewhat disagree with you
We need a solid mix of the short pass, but can’t abandon the run. What is good about having three good backs like we do is the ability to keep fresh legs in the game and wear down a defense. While we don’t need to get predictable, I have no problem with HCCS wanting to run the ball.
"Excellence is the unlimited ability to improve the quality of what you have to offer" Rick Pitino
by u_got_ragoned on Nov 21, 2011 6:43 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions 1 recs
I do not disagree. We cannot be one dimensional. But it seems like coaches all think that you have to run the ball to set up the pass.
All I am saying is that you must consider your personnel. And with the youth and inexperience we have up front, we are today a better passing team than running team. That is simply a fact and any objective look at our stats will bear that out. And while I recognize that the o-line has clearly improved from their early season lapses, I still think we are a much more effective offensive team when we throw the ball, especially on the shorter, quick routes.
Some examples:
Against West Virginia, we had 25 first down plays:
17 were runs (0, 6, 3, -6, 10, 3, 0, 4, 6, 8, 9, 2, 4, -2, 2, 12 , 0) this is 68% of first down plays for a 3.6 yd avg.
8 were passes – 5 of 7 completions (6, 10, 6, 14, 2) only 32% were passes for a 7.6 yd avg. – more than double the average running play
And while we ran it well against WVA, the fact is 9 of the 17 plays (53%) were for 3yds or less and 5 were for no gain or a loss (nearly 30%). You don’t get to second and short by running for no gain or a loss 30% of the time. Conversely, 4 of our 5 completions were for 6 yds or more and not all of these were the shorter routes that I prefer. As I said, the completion rate on those is easily 90%+.
Against Pitt we had 24 first down plays:
14 were runs for 54 yds. (3.9 yd avg.) We did well in the 1st qtr but were mostly shut down after that. The 2nd and 4th qtrs netted 8 total yards in 5 attempts.
10 were pass plays for 98 yds. (9.8 yd avg.)
And this was by far our most consistent game running the ball.
So it appears to me that the numbers are better when we throw on first down. More yardage and fewer negative yardage plays.
Finally, when we throw with Teddy rolling out, that gives us the additional option of him running it, which has proven to be a pretty good play too. It really puts a lot of pressure on their corners – not sure whether to stay back in coverage leaving Teddy free to take off, of coming up leaving the receiver open. And when those linebackers and corners start dropping to cover those short passes in the flat, that will spread the defense and open up some cracks for good gains on running plays.
I know we always hear that good football teams need to run the ball to set up their passing game. With our personnel, I think we need to use the short passing game, to set up our running game.
That’s the way it appears to me anyway.
by Carolina Cardinal on Nov 21, 2011 7:36 PM EST up reply actions
It's the chicken or the egg.
Does the passing game open up the running game, or does the running game open up the passing game?
I personally thinking HCCS is challenging our guys to get the running game going. The numbers show that the coaching staff will pass more quick passes than run as of late.
-Dustin
Agree that they would prefer to establish the run and they have likely challenged our guys, and they are improving
But we threw much less last week than in the prior two wins.
by Carolina Cardinal on Nov 22, 2011 3:23 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed
We’ve had more success running the ball lately, but I still don’t understand why the likes of Parker, A Smith, and Bellamy aren’t getting more looks. I don’t know if Teddy is just being conservative, or if it’s because of the playcalling. All of these guys have shown they have the ability to attack the ball and out-leap and out-muscle d-backs, but they’re rarely given the opportunity.
by centrecard on Nov 21, 2011 6:47 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
That's fine in principal
But from whom are you going to take away throws to get more to those guys? Parker? Rodgers? I think wide receiver is simply hands down the deepest and most talented squad on the team. That’s why we have seen so many WRs play other positions, like Bellamy at CB.
by twistedenglish77 on Nov 21, 2011 7:31 PM EST up reply actions
We may have the best group of wide recievers in the entire country
and considering most are freshmen, it is scary how good we will be at this position in the future. It’s going to be fun.
by Carolina Cardinal on Nov 21, 2011 7:38 PM EST up reply actions
Selective memory.
Because a lot of the time when they try to give them the “looks” Teddy is running around for his life.
I agree some more quick short passes on 1st down may be a good thing. But as for the passing game in genral, Teddy often does not get the protection to really make the passing game dangerous.
We’ve had a converted froshman DE from Fern Creek who was not a supperstar starting on the OL!!!
Passing OR running is going to be tough.
As we have seen……
Good point on the O-line, but did those two 3rd down midrange passes to Smith and Bellamy require a lot of time? Throw the ball up to these guys and let them make a play once in a while.
by centrecard on Nov 21, 2011 9:17 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions
Next Year
With an OL that is experienced, stronger, etc., Teddy will have an explosive year passing it. We get all but one starter back, I think, with Benavides to anchor them. We are really going to be awesome on offense in 2012! hee hee (kid in a candy store with Dad’s credit card).
And one of the reasons I like the quick, short, safe passes is precisely because they can be delivered very quickly.
Those types of plays greatly minimize any flaws in the o-line.
by Carolina Cardinal on Nov 21, 2011 9:20 PM EST up reply actions
Hmm
While I agree with Carolina overall about that short pass on 1st Down, I also agree with those saying we don’t pass more in general because protection has not been very good on the year. I think you really do have to consider that Teddy’s still only been a starter for what, 7 games or so? He’s uber-talented, but he’s still big-time in learning mode. The last thing is that I’ve come to realize from paying close attention to Strong’s comments over the last 2 years that he is very much committed to a system, not individuals (even coaches). He’s going to fit you to his preferred system, not vice versa. It makes us fans agitated (I’m certainly guilty of that this year), but I think he’s building for the future and not a single year. I trust him, even if the growing pains are …. painful. Re: USF, I choose to believe we’re going to do what we always do in Tampa (lose). We’re already in a bowl so I’ll watch that game without the angst I usually have and whatever happens happens. Even with the win we don’t control our own fate BCS-wise, but it would be like being on an episode of Twilight Zone if we actually were to get that bid.

by 













