Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Which Players Will Join The 3,000-Hit Club?

Krag (F-) Ruined Us: UofL-UK Report Card

 

I started to re-watch the game but I don't know what I expected to see that I missed while watching live.  A frustrating game that really wasn't really that bad.  Sure, we lost the fourth straight year to our biggest rival.  But I didn't really expect to win, and after those first two plays, I thought UK was going to score 250 points.

So let's go to the old standby gimmick, the post-game Report Card: 

Randall Cobb: A Best player on the field, most important player to his team in the nation, Randall Cobb was the difference maker today.  In addition to the one-handed catch, the un-touched touchdown run from the WildCobb formation and the key pass to get a first down on the first play of their game-clinching drive, Cobb also averaged 29.5 yards on kickoff returns.  Really hope he jumps to the NFL (although I'm not sure what position he plays there) so we don't have to deal with him next year.

Mike Summers: A UK's offensive line helped paved the way for a sick 6.2 yard/per carry, which is warped a little by Cobb's 4 carries for 80 yards.  But Derrick Locke averaged 4.5 yards per carry, and basically every time they handed it off, even if the play was defended well, they got 4, 5 or 6 yards with no problem.  And when Hartline did drop back to pass, they only let pressure get on him a few times.  True, the Cardinal defense played much better in the second half, but UK's running game set the tone.

Steve Kragthorpe: F-  Seriously, how much damage can one man do?  The talent just isn't there.  We may have a worse record but a happier fanbase this year just because it is so clear Strong is almost starting from virtually nothing.  I thought the defense was depleted, but the offense isn't much better. Our best offensive weapons are mostly in high school still, or new guys who are hurt.  There's only so long you can blame your predecessor, but we are still squarely in that window. 

Troy Pascley: D Ugh.  The touchdown catch that was dropped was not a slam-dunk.  The bubble screen was not a great throw and was well-covered so may not have resulted in anything.  The bomb from Froman was underthrown and would have been a spectacular catch if he could have held on to it.  The reverse was not well blocked.  But the first down throw (after two great Powell runs and when we started getting some momentum going) that was just straight dropped was bad, and the senior picked a bad day to have both bad luck and a terrible game.  Hopefully Bellamy is okay - that was a scary hit - but if he's not, hopefully Pascley shakes off today and rediscovers the talent of his earlier career. 

Bilal Powell: B-  The 80 yard TD was awesome.  So much for SEC speed on the other side (more on that later).  And before that, Powell had some good runs, but nothing spectacular.  The fumble didn't hurt, but on the next series (the last offensive drive of the game), Powell wasn't in there for a couple critical plays on the other side of the 50.  Blayne Donnell took his place, and while he had one good run, he also caught an outlet pass from Froman with all sorts of daylight in front of him - but he was so far towards the sideline he stepped out for basically no gain.  No idea why Powell was sitting on that drive, but if it was because of the fumble, then just because UK didn't score doesn't mean that the fumble caused no harm.  Overall, a good game and a spectacular 80-yard TD but we needed more on the rest of the plays from our best player to win today.  

Adam Froman: C  As much as Kragthorpe ruined us, Bobby Petrino did to a certain extent to: we were spoiled for a long time on stud quarterbacks, brilliant playcalling and execution allowing us to score at will.  I wonder what Froman would have been like under Bobby Petrino?  Would he have run the offense like Lefors?  Or is his ceiling what we saw today?  We'll never know.  Some good throws, no huge mistakes (that I could tell), a little bit of scramble (for a mobile QB he only had 1 real carry), but nothing spectacular, and in fact almost limiting the offense because of his arm strength.  He said in the paper we were trying to score on every play, but unless that plan includes the possibility that every run can be an 85 yard TD run.....Anyway, granted the Pascley-TD throw was good enough that it should have been a TD, and Pascley and Smith both dropped first down passes.  And Froman isn't terrible, and maybe our standards are so high because of the Redman/Ragone/Lefors/Brohm run we had (and the offensive ability of John L. Smith and Bobby Petrino).  But I really would not mind seeing Justin Burke try to throw the ball downfield a little more.  If our QB isn't going to run the ball, why do we need a mobile QB without a great arm? 14/29, 127 yards, 1 INT is just not up to Louisville Quarterback Standards and, like with Powell, we need more from our quarterback to win games.

Overall Defense:  D (first half)  B (second half)  I'm sure I wasn't the only one freaking out after those first two plays by UK.  The rest of the first half wasn't much better - Cobb's huge TD run and a 10 play, 92 yard scoring drive that only had 1 third down, which resulted in a 17 yard pass.  The second half, however, was pretty good.  UK may have just started playing it safe, but holes that were there in the first half weren't there in the second half and the defense held them to just one field goal and no touchdowns after halftime.  The defense didn't force any turnovers, but that's why Hartline was in there, because he takes care of the ball even if he's not doing anything spectacular. 

The other interesting thing about the defense: the youth.  True freshman Preston Brown, Marcus Smith and BJ Butler all saw pretty decent minutes, and it looked like Hakeem Smith (RS FR) and Shenard Holton (SO) played safety for most of the second half.

Doug Beaumont: A- Basically ignored in the first half, Doug caught some tough passes over the middle in the second half, including picking up huge first downs to give us a chance. Froman overthrew him in the endzone on that last drive.  Would have been a pretty awesome first touchdown.  As it is, I assume we'll have to wait for EKU game for his first. 

Papa Johns Cardinal Stadium: A Love the addition, love the Norton Terrace, didn't get to see the PNC club but I'm sure I'd love it too. 

New Intro Video: D-  On paper, great idea.  In execution - basically, the entire stadium was waiting, waiting, waiting, waiting, and then that weird video with the 5'2'' guy in a football uniform, and the horses.  Just a bad way to manage the pre-game excitement.  And while the idea of the starting gate bell going off when the players run out is cool, the video had the horses racing and hitting the finish line, so it didn't make sense.  And then you couldn't hear what charlie strong was saying in the video message.  Overall, I really hope they get that fixed.  It's not as bad as Coldplay was last year during timeouts, but it was pretty bad.

Kentucky Football: C+ Seriously, they've beaten us 4 years in a row, but they have another 6-6 or 7-5 season coming, and only because their OOC schedule is terrible and they drew both Mississippi's (one of which just lost to Jacksonville State) instead of Alabama or LSU from the SEC West.   This isn't the year they beat South Carolina or Tennessee.  They weren't that fast outside Cobb and Locke, and their defense has slipped from its high point of the last few years.  In sum, they beat us today, but the 4 year run in which they beat us involved their best team in a generation beating our 6-6 team on a last second blown assignment, a 10-0 game that turned into 27-2 late, barely beating us at home last year with one of our worst teams in a decade, and then holding on today and "not losing" against the lowest talent UofL will have in awhile.  Not exactly domination, mainly just taking advantage of Kragthorpe. 

I'm sure I'm leaving out things/people/ideas but this is a simple thing: the cupboard is bare, the team played hard, UK did enough to win, and now we have to wait another year to get our crack at Kentucky.  I'm sure Charlie Strong is already thinking about it.

Comment 81 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

dude seriously dont talk about schedules

you guys sched a ranked team in ooc so you could at least play 3 ranked teams even though pitt lost to utah and will be exiting the polls .. its also funny how you make excuses for the 4 straight losses, so i guess when you guys were beating the 2 and 4 win uk teams, it dont matter because we sucked then or before last year when you guys beat the worst coach in uk basketball history billy g twice in a row.. it dont matter because we sucked… quit with the lame excuses . it was a good game with the better team winning

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 5, 2010 1:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Pitt will not be exiting the polls

They were #15, they played #24 on the road and were 3-point dogs. They lost by 3. They’ll drop a few places and Utah will rise a few. They’ll both be around 20 or so.

by rickmbari on Sep 5, 2010 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Im so sick of this UK fan

always thinks he has to “correct” all of us. We really dont care, dude. Its a Cardinal Blog-our opinions are what matter, so beat feet. (Get the fuck out)

by twistedwedge on Sep 5, 2010 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

red rage and twistedwedge

please calm down..(WUSAA) first red rage i will post wherever the fuck i want, im not talking trash like you and this other bozo is, i dont make fun of louisville or their fans, i simply post my opinion on the thread at hand.. now if you two dont like, well i suggest you go cry to people who run this site, because i could care less who the fuck doesn’t like it, but respect a difference of opinion … i love this “get the fuck out” or “this our site” fuck chill out… i could see if i was in here going " WOOO 4 in a row" or " charlie isn’t strong enough" or some trollish shit like that but you haven’t and will never see me post bs like that… if i disagree with something i will state my opinion on it and give examples, if you dont like, tough shit

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 5, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good article...

Very unbiased and matter-of-fact except for the last paragraph regarding “kentucky football”…Some how he comes to a conclusion that this isn’t the year we beat So. Carolina or TN, but fails to explain how or why…Try using some logic and common sense when making your analysis or else you destroy your credibility…Overall a good game played by both teams…Too bad the UK team from the first half and the UL team from the second half didn’t play like that the whole game…It would have been really exciting to see.

by Catucky10 on Sep 5, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

he doesn't "explain how" or why because

uk’s season is not the feature of his post. if you want deep analysis on uk football, go to a uk site. it’s really quite simple. he stated his opinion about uk’s season based on what he saw in yesterday’s game. period, end of story. stop being so defensive… or better yet, just leave.

by quiet cardinal on Sep 5, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have yet to see Tenn. play but I don't think you will be S. Carolina

This was the first game which typically has alot of mistakes but it seemed like S. Carolina seemed to be clicking a little better. Who knows though, I don’t really judge any team until after the 2nd game when they should have most of the bugs worked out in the system.

Either way the game was good. Even though we lost, I saw alot of things that I was hoping to see. We will be back and I’m still confident that we will go bowling this year.

-Dustin

by Civicman86 on Sep 6, 2010 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

yea tenn is very beatable .. but sc

it seems we will never beat the visor … think everyone is putting to much stock into the first game of the season..uk and louisville will be better by conf play… think uk will be 4-0 entering conf play so an 7 to 8 win season is very possible and likely

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 6, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

This isn't the year they'll beat Tennessee or S. Carolina

Because the jerseys they wear say Tennessee and S. Carolina. It’s never really mattered who goes on the field, UK finds some way to lose. Believe me, I’ve been to the past 10 ut vs uk games. I’m amazed at what those kids in blue can do to lose a game.

by cardsince86 on Sep 5, 2010 8:26 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

get the hell outta here

seriously, get a life. i know how b/c you’re a sUcK fan that you think you know everything better. but seriously, get a life. it’s a pretty sad existance when you are consistently talking trash and the first to do so on your rival’s blog. get a life.

i think that your crustache would agree with me that instead of staying up til 5am posting on rival blogs maybe you should try and go get laid.

get a life. or don’t. whatever. just get outta here.

by $1Kcard on Sep 5, 2010 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

guarantee i get more pussy then you

son .. i get on here at my gravy ass job…YOU on the other hand need to get some ass so you wont be so pissed all the time again… WUSAAAA

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 5, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

and the guy telling me to get laid is real mature right?

just love how other bloggers knock another for blogging… if im bored at work or a boring off day i blog, plus x-box 360 SUCKS PS3 BABY

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 6, 2010 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

its always trolling when its an unpopular opinion

unless i say louisville and its fans are the shit and kiss up to you guys then im trolling…lol oh well i guess i am a troll

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 6, 2010 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK, sometimes you're not trolling

You’re still not blogging. You’re commenting.

by rickmbari on Sep 7, 2010 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

LMFAO

+ GREAT BURN FUCKING EPIC

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 5, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

no i appreciate a damn good burn

and don’t take these commentts to heart.. something you should really try bro

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 6, 2010 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Adam Froman has Derek Zoolander syndrome...

He can’t turn left. I don’t think he looked to the left side of the field on a pass a single time in the first three quarters. Of course, it doesn’t help when you have Troy Passdropley over there.

by UofL Redbirds on Sep 5, 2010 1:50 AM EDT reply actions  

only sos i could find

has louisville 66 and uk actually 67 so looks like strength of schedules are a non factor

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 5, 2010 1:51 AM EDT reply actions  

FYI

We have a harder SOS than you. BooYa!

by UofL Redbirds on Sep 5, 2010 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

You play us. We play you. Thus the difference

I Shall Always Be The Cat......In The Hat!!! The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 5, 2010 7:57 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

You play us. We play you. Thus the difference

I Shall Always Be The Cat......In The Hat!!! The Artist Formerly Known As ABC!

by Greg Alan Edwards on Sep 5, 2010 7:57 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Krag Ruined Us

I’d just like to amplify the “Krag Ruined Us” though with the following observations about the last 3 years:

1. The Offense got worse.
2. The Defense got worse.
3. Special teams got worse.
4. Turnovers caused got worse.
5. Recruiting got worse.
6. The 25-years Recruiting spigot to AL/GA/FL got turned off (hello, JUCOs from UT!).
7. Redshirts were burned with apparently zero thought, strategy or foresight.
8. Fan apathy and general malaise increased.
9. Scheduling got worse (why, why, WHY are we wasting games against I-AA?!?!?)

Am I missing anything? Were there ANY improvements to the program during the 3 years? As CardsFan922 mentioned, the local area recruiting pipeline looks like a nice foundation for the future (with the kids from Seneca, Ballard and hopefully the Central RB) which is the same way the UofL program stabilized / improved a decade ago (Redman, Ibn Green then Brohm/Bush).

by Quinn1979 on Sep 5, 2010 7:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Scheduling a game against one 1-AA team is the way most big boys roll

Easy win then schedule 3 (or 4 in a Big East team’s case) weak 1-A teams for was wins. Easier to get to bowl eligibility and voters look at record. 11-1 with 4 cupcakes is better in the voters’ eyes than 7-5 with the toughest schedule in the nation.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."

by geoffissiffoeg on Sep 5, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd give Froman a D.

Other than the nice run on the broken play he sucked. Most of his throws were high/overthrown, or too far out in front. He telegraphed a lot of his passes, because he stared the receiver down until he threw it. On the play where Donnel stepped outt, Froman didn’t notice Beaumont wide open towards the end zone. I also though Beaumont’s diving catch could have been for a TD had Froman thrown it better.

by CardinalDude on Sep 5, 2010 7:42 AM EDT reply actions  

Disagree

The only mistakes he made were 2 or 3 overthrown balls on the lat drive. If our receivers catch balls try should have caught, we would have an at least one more touchdown, a 50 yard bomb, and two big first downs in the 3rd quarter on drives that ended in punts on those series of downs. I like Froman’s arm. I think we’re goingtonuse his legs more in the future. He had one run and it went for 13. Don’t know why we never went back to it.

Now I think we’re going to be better than I thought we were a week ago, but I don’t think we have a good shot at a bowl. We’ll probably be favoites in only 3 games from here on out. I don’t see us pulling out 3 upsets, especially as injuries mount. I just want to get as much PT for young guys as possible (without Kragshirting guys)

by uoflcard on Sep 6, 2010 10:12 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not giving up: A
This is the first game in a while where I remember us even hanging with a decent team in the second half, much less having a better one. The Cards didn’t hang their heads after that horrendous 1st quarter: they outplayed UK for the next 3 quarters. It was just good to see the effort and a sincere desire to win. It wasn’t there last year.

Kicking Game: A+
Wait……we now have both a serviceable punter and a place kicker? Blazer was able to keep it away from Cobb and pin them within the 20 on 2 occasions. Philpott calmly splits the uprights on all of his field goal attempts. This is a major stride compared to the last 3 years here. No shanks and no kickoffs out-of-bounds. A+ boys.

Penalties and covering wide open guys: A-
Only 4 for 30 yards compared to UK’s 11 for 90 yards. This is the first game of the year and tensions were high, yet the Cards only succumbed to minor penalties and no horribly blown pass coverages (exceptions: Cobb’s multiple huge runs). This team showed much more poise than I expected in such an emotional game.

DocCardsFan
The 'Ville, KY

by DocCardsFan on Sep 5, 2010 7:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Bleser got riped by teh coaches after two poor punts

Both of the kicks “inside the 20” were barely inside of the 20 and each traveled about 25 yards

by Chris Redman is my hero on Sep 5, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Look at the title of the site

this isn’t Sea of Blue, the game is over, go back to where you came from (unless that rock is full of other UK trolls)

by RDJones on Sep 5, 2010 7:53 AM EDT reply actions  

SOS?

There is no way you can compare schedules!

The fact that UofLOL plays UK is part of the reason your schedule strength is were it is.

And yeah, we play both Mississippi schools. Advantage may be ours this year. But you fail to understand that we alternate through the WEST every year. One year, we play Alabama, LSU, Arkansas. The next we play Auburn and both Mississippi schools. And we still play the other 5 schools in the EAST.

So don’t try to compare schedules…. It ain’t happenin’

I do however like Charlie Strong. I think he will do well if he can get some talent. But don’t fall in love for long, he’ll take the first upgrade available!

by ukcatsfan2 on Sep 5, 2010 9:59 AM EDT reply actions  

"I want myself and my argument to be taken seriously

but I’m going to come on a Louisville blog and call them UofLOL."

Fail, if you want people to care what you say, drop the insults.

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."

"But How will I know limits from lies, if I never try."

by geoffissiffoeg on Sep 5, 2010 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wall Street Journal SOS comparison

http://graphicsweb.wsj.com/documents/NCAAF/NCAAF2010.html

Albeit, it is a preseason version, but to say “don’t try to compare” as if UK’s SOS is obviously tougher than Louisville’s is not true according to smart people who calculate these types of things.

by UL is my hot hot sex on Sep 5, 2010 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

Seriously, go back to KSR or whatever trailer park in a hollar you crawled out of. Go talk to someone else about your nonconference cupcakes and all the great SEC homecoming games you’ll be apart of this year.

by JMC1 on Sep 5, 2010 10:22 AM EDT reply actions  

Bilal was hurt the series he missed

I watched him after the fumble, he came off the field holding his arm. The trainers worked on his shoulder for a series or two, I don’t know if they had to pop it back into place or not, but they were massaging it for awhile. Then he made a block on a blitzer when he came back in and walked off holding his arm again. I don’t know if it’s serious, but he was defintely playing hurt at the end of that game. Might’ve been what caused the fumble.

by Chris Redman is my hero on Sep 5, 2010 10:24 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for posting

I couldn’t see from my end and didn’t hear anything about this after the game.

by CardsFan922 on Sep 5, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Off topic, but...

I really enjoyed the new tradition of the team coming over to salute the fans with the help of the marching band. Anyone know if this is a UF thing or just a CCS thing? It is really refreshing, win or lose for the team to come over and salute the fans and the fans being able to show their appreciation, rather than the team just walking off of the field with their heads hung low.

by LankySteve on Sep 5, 2010 11:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Simplified

UK’s 1st Quarter: A+
UofL’s 1st Quarter: F

UK’s rest of the game: C
UofL’s rest of the game: B

I guarantee you this Louisville team will surpass last year’s final record. We’ll be bowl eligible.

by CardsFanTX on Sep 5, 2010 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Bilaaaaaaaaal

I think you gotta give Bilal Powell a better grade than B-. Even if you take away his 80 yard rush, he still had 15 carries for 73 yards. At 4.9 yards a carry, thats pretty respectable. And then he had the big run too. The only reason he doesnt get an A+ is because of the fumble. I hope his injury is minor, and I give him a B+.

In other news, UK fans on this site are ULTRA annoying.

by LouisvillePhysics on Sep 5, 2010 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Ya, the injury...

….had I know, I think his grade goes higher. Fumbles happen, that’s not the reason he was docked. If his absence on the next drive was because of the fumble, that’s why he would have been docked.

Also the expectations were up for him (fair or not) because of the Fact of the Team comments.

Luckily what I post/how I grade these means literally nothing.

by CardsFan922 on Sep 5, 2010 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh, by the way, i liked the article. I didnt mean to sound like i was attacking you in my comment, i just wanted to show my happiness in Powell.

by LouisvillePhysics on Sep 5, 2010 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bellamy

was not quite ready on VA’s kick return. He tried to keep VA in the end zone, and then wasn’t sure of where to go when a blue clad shoulder pad caught him square under the chin. Losing what is likely our second best wide receiver was a huge blow and let the secondary focus on Beaumont. I hope like heck he’s ready to go soon.

I agree with Mike about the qb spot, either run the damn ball or let somebody else throw it. I thought the play calling was pretty conservative in the first half and did nothing to loosen up the 8 man front.

I liked the effort by the players and the coaches. I’m not convinced we’ve bottomed as the O line is going to get a massive changeover next year, thank you A$$thorpe.

by 85card on Sep 5, 2010 2:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this post represent the thoughts, opinions and impressions of CardsFan922 only, and in no way represent the thoughts, impressions or opinions of Mike Rutherford. Mike Rutherford will share the definitive, organized and humorous opinions of Card Chronicle in a subsequent post. Any similarities between those opinions and the views expressed in this post are unintentional and purely coincidental. Any subsequent, contradictory views expressed by Mike Rutherford negate and/or override all views expressed in this post. We regret all errors.

by CardsFan922 on Sep 5, 2010 3:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Haha

Wish there was a concise version of this to put in the footer of all my posts/comments.

by UL is my hot hot sex on Sep 6, 2010 5:21 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

great post

one thing that i notcied and loved is that after each series, HCCS was in all the huddles getting in guys faces, pumping them up, etc… under the old regime, you would see the asst.’s doing all the talking and the brainless krag wondering around the sideline. I enjoyed HCCS presence and his ability to get guys to work for him.

i’m not totally convinced of sanfords’ play-calling abilities…yet. In his defense though, I think that in order to run this offense better, we simply need better, faster players. I think that we will continue to have growing pains on the offensive side of the ball until we get some real speed that is needed to run a spread offense effectively.

i thought the defense in the second half was better, obviously. but, i couldn’t tell if we came out with better adjustments or if UK’s offense just started to stall a bit….i’m hoping its the former not latter.

by $1Kcard on Sep 5, 2010 2:46 PM EDT reply actions  

The defense

was a reason to be upbeat after the loss. They did make some good adjustments at Half. The biggest was much better containment. Still not what I would call good containment, but it was significantly better than in the 1st Half. And the result was a stifling of UK’s running game in the 2nd Half. Also, our undersized D-Line started blowing the UK line back as the game wore on. I think that’s a testament to the conditioning regimen and HCCS’s ability to keep the guys fired up for all 4 Quarters. Seriously, UK was running running running. Normally that means a worn out defense in the 4th Quarter. But if anything, our guys looked more energetic later than they did early in the game. And finally, think about all the really good open field tackles! Scruggs (D End) on a RB… Simien on 2 occasions. Johnny Patrick at least once that I recall. And there were others. That’s a really big deal! A big part of UofL’s lack of success stopping people under Krapthorpe was the embarrassing arm tackling and constant misses by at least the first guy. Our defense in this game was the most fundamentally sound I’ve seen in the last 4 years. So, chins up! Even with depleted talent, I honestly think this team will go .500 this year. Outside shot at 7-5.

by CardsFanTX on Sep 5, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Defense was much better. It seemed like they were shading Locke with saftey for most of the 2nd half, but that could be my complete lack of football understanding.

I said the same thing to my wife about conditioning. Our guys didn’t seem to wear down at all late in the game, there’s just a major lack of talent right now.

Offensively I thought we were in the right play numerous times and just didn’t execute. Eventually I Think they started playing to what they thought they could do, and it ended up being a bit conservative. Also, you have to understand 1st game with a new offense. Baby steps.

We’re heading in the right direction.

by dlpfis79 on Sep 5, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great point

About tackling in space. Much better job than last year. I think I read pre-season about coaches having to literally start from scratch teaching guys how to tackle. So I guess they did a good job with that.

by CardsFan922 on Sep 5, 2010 3:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

agreed - players looked fresh later in the game

in the right direction for sure… I am very excited for the next game and the next. I think that by the WVU game we will see 2 diff’t teams. we will continue to gel together and i think our offense will start to work the kinks out

by $1Kcard on Sep 5, 2010 3:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Love the Kragthorpe grade

UL Football Fan/UK Basketball Fan ~ Okinawa, Japan

by The White Mandingo on Sep 6, 2010 4:32 AM EDT reply actions  

UL football fan

UK basketball fan, which one is the wife and which is the mistress?

I woke up feeling BLUE this morning. It's gonna be a great day.

by kywineman on Sep 6, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Neither

Love them both

UL Football Fan/UK Basketball Fan ~ Okinawa, Japan

by The White Mandingo on Sep 6, 2010 9:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Polygamist.

Shouldn’t you be a fan of Utah basketball/BYU football?

by CARD_G6 on Sep 7, 2010 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Krag's offensive weapons

He had two pretty good ones. Of course one is now the starting RB at Ga Tech and the other is the starting QB at TN. Not only could the idiot not recruit, he ran off kids with talent. What a loser. As a coach and as a person.

by cbcard on Sep 6, 2010 10:02 AM EDT reply actions  

“This team is capable of winning 8 or 9 ballgames next year, without a doubt…”

-Steve Kragthorpe

I applaud you Mr. Jurich for not drinking the Krag Koolaid for one more year. You put this fraud out on his ass, and for great reason.

________________________________________________
www.lordkayoss.com

by LORD KAYOSS on Sep 7, 2010 4:14 AM EDT reply actions  

I felt like we played better

But it still sucks losing 4 straight. Kind of down today-need some caffeine or something. We will be lucky to win 4-5 games. Reality kind of setting in.

by Chip Constant on Sep 7, 2010 10:18 AM EDT reply actions  

no guarantees in life

be at home next year with an actual idea of what strong will run… i look for a very competitive game next year, both teams should be better with a good class coming in… but waaay to early to think about it

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 8, 2010 3:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

lol ill remember that.. one class isnt going to miraculously

make louisville better.. louisville will have a better chance of winning but you wont be to much better.. football isnt basketball .. what you see this year might and i do mean might be a lil better next year but you will be putting a tweaked version on this years team on the field.. but again way to early for either side to think about a year from now… but hey i love your enthusiasm, thats ehat i like about this rivalry

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 8, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes i did predict a louisville win BUT

it was due to uk not knowing what louisville was going to do, home field, first game of the season, and the crazy confidence strong brought them, not because they were the better team… im not saying uk is going to win next year either .. just saying dude giving a guarantee for next years game is kinda dumb, he thinks louisville will be super good and uk will be super bad… not likely both teams will be close to what we will see this year …. last year 30-13 uk this year 23-16 now with uk having the home field and our o-line not being freshmen and strong having a year under his belt then it will again come down to players and skill level… this year uk had that advantage next year who knows but i GUARANTEE neither will be miles ahead or behind what we will see this year.. so it will be very close again..strong will have louisville really good in 2 to 3 more years but he won’t be just destroying teams after just one year… as i have said a few times building a football team up from zero or after being KRAGGED down will be a 3 to 4 year process if not longer.. can louisville beat uk next year… yes …are they going to be so good it is a guaranteed win.. not even close

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 9, 2010 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree one class won't make it better

But I’ll save my judgement for when the season is over, because I believe coaching makes a huge difference. I don’t think you can guarantee (or count out) next year’s team on just one game. If we’re going by developing players, Red Rage has confidence and Coach Strong’s staff and coaching to get the team where they need to be by next year.

by guyngreen on Sep 9, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions  

i agree that strong will have louisville ready..

he had them ready this year he just didnt have the players, he will get them and bring a very tough team every year… just think its a lil early to guarantee anything.. i think no team has won 5 straight so odds are uk loses but a wise man would wait and see.. i know i am

"UK ....enough said"

by kentuckywild on Sep 9, 2010 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Card Chronicle, the Louisville sports blog Otis George might read if he knew it existed.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Undefeated Record on the Line Monday Night!
Wayf_2_small
Andy's TV Gets Chron'd
Small
U of Ls Chane Behanan mimicks a hometown star Danny Fortson of Cincinnati
Small
Conflicted UofL fan
Small
D. Smith and A. Wales
Small
COMMENTS PLEASE
Small
Nerlens Noel reclasses to 2012 ,could Louisville pick up a late recruit?
Pic_small
So what is our football recruiting class ranked?
315664_2514036285617_1094464286_32939125_2046783462_n_small
Which game do you want back?
Small
UofL's 3rd Biggest Rival?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Admm_small Mike Rutherford