Swopshire to start against St. John's
Rick Pitino announced on a teleconference this morning that sophomore forward Jared Swopshire will return to the starting lineup on Thursday night against St. John's, replacing fellow sophomore Terrence Jennings.
Swopshire started 16 of Louisville's first 18 games this season.
"Three of the last four games we’ve got off to really poor starts," Pitino said. "We’re still going to play T.J. at the four spot with Samardo throughout the game, and he’ll definitely get as many minutes as he’s been getting."
While I don't necessarily disagree with the move - I don't see the point in starting TJ if he's going to consistently be taken out before the 18 minute mark - I'm not sure where Pitino's seeing slow starts in three of the last four games.
Louisville jumped out to an 11-3 lead against Rutgers early and then expanded it to 22-9 on their way to a wire-to-wire victory. The Cards also never trailed earlier in the week against Connecticut, whom they jumped on top of 17-9 and 25-12 early.
Interested to hear the fan reaction to this.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Ploy?
To get Jennings motivated to start producing more on the defensive side? We all know he can put the ball in the basket from two feet away. I think Pitino wants to see him become more than just a tall guy. Or he wants to reward Swop for coming close to a double double against Rutgers. He also might not have been able to get in touch with Will Scott to translate the scouting report yet….
by REALISTICCARDSFAN on Feb 10, 2010 12:23 PM EST reply actions
I think inserting him into the starting lineup was the ploy
Jennings has pretty much proven that he doesn’t handle tough love particularly well.
by Mike Rutherford on Feb 10, 2010 12:49 PM EST up reply actions
With his assists and outside shotting, Swop's got more skills.
Jennings isn’t going to get bullied like Swop does at times, but he makes big defensive mistakes all the time. I think coach should base it on the opponent. For every lineup, there is a season.
I'm ok with this
Swop certainly has played well enough the past couple of games to warrant a starting spot, and like Pitino said, he’s going to continue to play TJ and Samardo together and give him about the same minutes. I’m perfectly fine with this as long as it doesn’t lead to Pitino leaving Swop in for 10 minutes while we get crushed on the boards.
by Chris Redman is my hero on Feb 10, 2010 12:36 PM EST reply actions
I think Jennings isn't the kind of player you play head games with
He’s not mentally tough enough. I think he regresses b/c of this change.
Pitino has been mad at TJ's transistion D and handling our press D.
Once TJ understands what CRP wants, I think he’ll deliver.
by Remote Cardinal on Feb 10, 2010 1:49 PM EST reply actions
Here's my .02 (I have very high inflation, so don't expect it to be worth much when you get home)
TJ – athletic freak, but no discernable basketball skills.
Swop – Slightly above average athlete, but has every skill in the book. Lacks strength to finish (like, he’s really bad at it), but I think some of that stems from lack of confidence.
Here’s what it comes down to for me. Jennings isn’t much offensive threat at all from the four, but his presence seems to help create better spacing for everyone, particularly Samardo. On the defensive end, it’s a bit tougher to figure out, but he’s probably not as good of a defensive rebounder as Swop, though he’s a better helpside shot blocker, and he’s gotten some steals (who knows if that’s statistically significant though). Swop, meanwhile, is more of a scoring threat from the four (who would you take in a jump shooting contest? Swop or TJ), and he’s arguably the best defensive rebounder on a team that isn’t very good at defensive rebounding. He’s also, in my opinion, a better perimeter defender on a team that isn’t very good at defending the perimeter.
We’re already a really efficient offense (11th in the nation), but we’re terrible at defense, particularly guarding the perimeter and getting on the defensive glass. So the question is this: does TJ’s shot blocking presence, occasional steals, and apparent improvement of an already really good offense (even though I don’t think he’s got much “box score impact”) outweigh the possibility that he’s a worse defensive rebounder and perimeter defender on a team whose two biggest weaknesses are defensive rebounding and perimeter defense?
I don’t think it does. And I don’t even really think it’s a close call. Maybe if he was a great defensive rebounder it would be a debate, but he does appear to be. At the end of the day, I just don’t see him as a four on a Pitino team unless he puts in a ton of work this offseason. Maybe in a 3-2 offense he would work better, but not in the 4-1 RP favors, and certainly not in the zone we use. He just doesn’t have the skills for it right now. Fortunately for him, he’s got the athleticism to at least adequately develop them if he wants to.
by _TheGainesShow_ on Feb 10, 2010 1:55 PM EST reply actions
Great post
The only thing I issue with is any sort of praised pointed in the direction of Swop’s perimeter defense. He’s been awful at marking open guys beyond the arc and he also gives shooters way too much space, perhaps because he’s very slow laterally and worried about getting beat off the dribble.
Still, I think this is a situation where you throw both out there at different points in the first half and ultimately go with the hotter (or less freezing) hand.
by Mike Rutherford on Feb 10, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions
While everything you said about Swop is certainly true...
Jennings is worse there. His defense at the 4 is absolutely awful. He gets blocks based purely on height, wingspan, and athleticism, not really ability. I think that’s where Pitino really favors Swop (plus the jumpshooting ability), and that’s why he continues to see more minutes than the (arguably) “better” Jennings.
I didn't mean to imply that Swop was playing good perimeter defense
My opinion is only that he’s less bad at it than Jennings is. I agree that he’s tentative on closeouts to avoid the drive-by, but I think Jennings would be even worse. Heck, I’m not sure he has enough basketball IQ to even realize it’s a concern.
by _TheGainesShow_ on Feb 10, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
Still Waking Up
Jennings gets lost on defense in the zone so many times it’s comical. It’s like he’s still waking up from being tazed. We spotted Cincy 8 points. Spotted WVU 13. His defense on the press has been atrocious at the timeline. Atrocious. Like he’s stuck in cement. Also, Swop’s high-low passing was quite a nice addition to the offensive sets against Rutgers. That will be a big deal against Syracuse. If Jennings starts rebounding like a madman, he will play. And at least occasionally paying attention would help.
See Bozich's Blog
http://www.courier-journal.com/blogs/bozich/blog.html
Third post down, when I posted this:
Video of Smith telling reporters how to get playing time with Pitino. You have to produce on the D.
v. Rutgers on D
Jennings— 9 minutes = 0 blocks, 0 steals, 0 rebounds
Swop— 34 minutes = 0 blocks, 0 steals, 8 rebounds
Jennings having 8 points in 9 minutes was still pretty impressive considering that was a “bad” game for him, but I guess he’s got to produce on the D.
Switching positions around is probably not helping him get a lot better.
by REALISTICCARDSFAN on Feb 10, 2010 2:45 PM EST reply actions
we started out slow against WVU
with TJ in, maybe he is thinking about that game since it slipped away from us.
Courier Journal had just printed an article praising Swop coming off the bench
Talked about how much better of a role it was for him, and I agreed.
Guess Coach P sees things we’re just blind to. Guess that’s why he’s makin’ the millions.
________________________________________________
~LK
www.myspace.com/lordkayoss
www.youtube.com/lordkayossrippro
www.welcometomynightmare.tk
Nah
He just looks good in suits. Everybody knows Pitino’s just a well-manicured front for the actual coach, Denny Crum.
by UL is my hot hot sex on Feb 10, 2010 5:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
If collegiate basketball had never adopted the 3-point shot
I’d believe you.
________________________________________________
~LK
www.myspace.com/lordkayoss
www.youtube.com/lordkayossrippro
www.welcometomynightmare.tk
by LORD KAYOSS on Feb 11, 2010 10:10 PM EST up reply actions
What are you guys talking about?
Jennings out plays Swops almost every night. Defensively: Swops gives you nothing, Jennings is a game changer. Offensively let’s look at stats. Swops 37% shooting wide open shots because the other team does not even guard him, 1 point for 3.1 minutes played. Jennings 65% shooting, other teams can not double off of him which creates more spacing, 1 point for every 2.4 minutes played. Rebounds Swops 1 for every 4.2 minutes played. Jennings 1 for every 3.8 minutes played. Furthermore Jennings plays has hard as anybody on the court including Swops . Jennings has blocked 3 jump shots away from the basket this season so do not tell me he does not get out on shooters out of the 2-3.
It seems odd to change the lineup after 2 straight wins where we played our best ball in a month
I guess it doesn’t really matter because Rick will yank either one in a heartbeat. I hope this doesn’t throw off Sam, who has been playing well.
I don't care if Pitino wheels
5 guys from Murderball out there, as long as they win and get in (to the tourney)
ThreadKiller

by 











