ESPN3 and my ramblings
As with all new ESPN incarnations, I hated espn3 as soon as I found out that this was the vessel that is going to hold my football game hostage this week. Sometimes it’s the Big East Network, sometimes it’s ESPN U, or Fox Sports whatever, none of these channels I get, all of them I loath for making trek out to bar to watch the game (Not that I don’t like going to bars, it just distracts my focus form willing the team to victory).
After the AK St. game I classified ESPN3 as another toilet dweller.
I never got full connection speed, the picture froze up a ton, and when I ran it via HDMI to my big screen it looked positively 8-bit.
To say the least, I was not enthused about another ESPN3 game.
But, to be fair, the coverage this week was pretty good. I maintained a full connection speed almost the whole time, the picture was wide screen, and UL won by 56 points.
Some of the pros of ESPN3.COM
Less commercials then broadcast
Less in game ads ( this Fanpost brought to you by Red Giraffe Video)
16:9 aspect ratio
Negatives
Watching A football game on your computer is just lame, end o’ story
You are at the mercy of your connection speed
You are at the mercy of ESPN3’s bandwidth
Low production values
Still blacked out in other areas
I have ranked my personal preference of watching the game.
At Game, good seats / box
At home, HD, national or regional broadcast
Crappy seats at game
ESPN3.com
Local coverage, FSN, Big East Network, Non-HD
I guess this is sort of compliment to ESPN3 (your not as ugly as I thought you would be), but I would like to see the quality of the picture improve significantly.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I also found it much improved over the Arkansas State game
I may have been trying to watch it over wireless last time, I really don’t recall. This time I used a wired connection, and had almost no freezes, none of them during game action; and I was enjoying the game so much I didn’t have time to criticize the video quality – which was way less than HD, to be sure, but I didn’t care. It was clear enough to see the awesomeness of a 56-0 rout, and Friday night’s game will be on ESPN HD.
It was much better
than it was with the EKU game too. Props for improvement. It’s still shitty that they’re blocking out local stations for an internet channel. At least we can be happy this Friday. Odds are, if they pull out a win over Cinci, the Cards get some more games picked up and EPSN milks the Charlie Strong Louisville turnaround.
by REALISTICCARDSFAN on Oct 10, 2010 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
An added plus here
Is that Krags will be at home watching and crying about how Strong’s winning with all his players.
by REALISTICCARDSFAN on Oct 10, 2010 9:14 PM EDT up reply actions
The commentating could be improved greatly though.
“It’s third and three. That means if Looeyville gets three yards they will get a first down. They hand the ball off to Andyton and he gets 7 yards. That means the Cardinals get a first down.”
Spare me.
Another con - I shouldn't be able to do this:
I just got your email … I’m out for the season?
Don’t worry about that … I switched to Sprint so I get unlimited email.
Wh … what what does that mean?
It means I’m dropping you from my fantasy team, that’s for sure.
What does that mean about my KNEE?!
Oh, your knee is totally shattered – did you see how hard that guy hit you?
I don’t want to see …
Hey, hey, relax. Not costing me any extra.
My favorite thing is when they throw to the studio or sideline
And the ESPN3 feed just gets sweet silence. Much better than the alternative, imo.
What I can't figure out
is why, if the game is only being aired on espn3, they even throw it to the studio. I mean, who sees the studio stuff?
espn 3 is worse then local channels
or fox sports south.. but i agree with the rest of your rankings
FREE ENES
espn3 basically is local channels
except over teh interwebs, and with an ESPN halftime show. At least, that’s what it looked like for the SU games.

by 








