March Madness...ugh
The annual ode to the best postseason in sports and dig at the worst
Wouldn't it be great if today's game between Butler and LSU didn't mark the beginning of a month-long tournament that captivates the nation each year, but was rather simply a meeting of two above average teams at a neutral location that signified the end of the season for both the winner and the loser?
And wouldn't it also be great if there were like 30 more of these games?
Wouldn't you love to have to wait around for another three weeks to watch a pair of teams that haven't played in so long that you've forgotten most of their players' names duke it out in the only game that has any bearing on who wins the national championship?
And you know all those computers out there predicting the winners for each game in the Big Dance? Wouldn't it be great if those same computers actually had a major impact on which two teams were selected to play in the aforementioned title game?
Wouldn't it have been great if Stephen Curry and Davidson had played one game against South Alabama last year instead of four against Gonzaga, Georgetown, Wisconsin and Kansas?
Don't you just love not really knowing who the national champion is at the end of the season, or the fact that even if you think you do, someone can make a legitimate case for another team and you can't really say anything compelling outside of "my team would have beaten your team?"
Remember how Connecticut was ranked second and Louisville was ranked third in the preseason poll? Wouldn't it be great if the Huskies were chosen to play for the national championship over the Cardinals primarily for that reason?
Don't you hate having multiple games to choose from at all hours for four days straight? I mean enough is enough, right?
Weren't you stunned when North Carolina opened ACC play with back-to-back losses? Wouldn't it have been sweet if the Tar Heels had been forced to play for the next two and-a-half months with the knowledge that their chances of winning national title number five had already been crushed?
Don't you love the laid-back postseason atmosphere of a three-quarters empty stadium in mid-to-late December?
Is Memphis one of the two best teams in the country even though they play in a lightly regarded, non-power conference? There's only one way to find out: a single game against another team that also may or may not be one of the two best in the country.
Shouldn't Virginia Commonwealth have to go through more to win a national title than teams like Duke, North Carolina and UCLA simply because those three schools have won more championships and made more money for the NCAA in the past?
Didn't you hate that Boise State Fiesta Bowl game a few years back? Aren't you glad they didn't get to play another, more important game afterward?
Seven-word message to college basketball: obscure sponsors in the title of every game.
Can't we all agree that Louisville was a better team than NC State in 1983, and that the sports world would be a much better place had Lorenzo Charles never set foot on that Albuquerque floor 25 years ago?
Don't you love arguing over which conference is the strongest for multiple months and then never really getting the chance to have your position backed up or shot down because of unbalanced postseason ties?
Don't you just hate March?
Wake me when it's time for the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl.
1 recs |
11 comments
|
Comments
This column has a much greater impact
in years in which UofL wouldn’t be one of the two teams chosen to play in the championship game. This year, it doesn’t sound as bad as usual.
But even with a free pass the championship game, I think I’d rather follow the journey there, even if it means losing early. The anticipation is more fun than the result, and that’s the beauty of March.
by 83fan on Mar 19, 2009 8:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You say that, but the computers don't have Louisville as one of the top 2 seeds.
We are like 7th in the RPI… so we might get to play in the Orange Bowl of basketball games…and what does that give you but more money??
by jerb2 on Mar 19, 2009 9:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought about that, but the polls are 2/3 of it.
Being #1 in both gets us pretty far. And I believe we are ahead of Memphis in the RPI, so I think we would likely have the better BCS talley than Memphis, Pitt or UConn.
by 83fan on Mar 19, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, we are #4 in the RPI
Duke, Pitt, UNC, then Louisville
by twistedwedge on Mar 19, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but they'd never put two from the same conference in the title game
They’d go with the two conference champions.. so it would be Louisville vs… oh, wait.
by rickinva on Mar 19, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I get it
It took me a while, but I get it.
DocCardsFan
The 'Ville, KY
by DocCardsFan on Mar 19, 2009 8:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Still one of my all-time favorites
--PB--
by Peter Bean on Mar 19, 2009 9:14 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Wouldn’t it have been sweet if the Tar Heels had been forced to play for the next two and-a-half months with the knowledge that their chances of winning national title number five had already been crushed?
Yes, it would have been. ;)
by WolfpackSteelersFan on Mar 19, 2009 5:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 












