Card Chronicle: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Baby Boilers no more: Michigan State-Purdue Preview

The curious case of Card Chronicle and Dick Vitale

When top-ranked Connecticut takes on Louisville inside Freedom Hall this Monday evening, one of the men calling the game for ESPN will be College Basketball Hall of Famer Dick Vitale.

A little over two years ago, the rankings of the Cardinals and Huskies weren't nearly as lofty, but the situation was nearly identical. Big Monday. Freedom Hall. Raucous crowd. Vitale in the house.

I was fortunate enough to be part of the "White Out" that night and witness the Cards pull away in the second half for a 14-point win that officially signified the team was headed in the right direction after a disappointing 10-5 start. Excited, hungry and completely unwilling to begin work on a paper due the next morning, I decided to heat up some sort of grub and relive the magic of Louisville's win via Tivo.

It was fairly on in a first half that was admittedly poorly played when I noticed that Vitale - whose inability to focus on and discuss the game he's being paid heartily to focus on and discuss had already been well documented by many - was having even more difficulty controlling his CCADD (CC = color commentary) than usual. The man was talking about the Colts, the Yankees, Maria Sharapova; basically anything and everything besides the Connecticut Huskies and the Louisville Cardinals.

Initially, I started jotting down the most obscure people, places and things coming out of his mouth with the intention of posting them as a small tidbit on the game recap. But as I listened on and realized just how little this man was talking about the game being played five feet in front of him, I became increasingly ambitious.

This paper was not going to be handed in on time.

After restarting the game, heating up more food, and having to pause the TV several times in order to jot down steady streams of irrelevancies, I had an extensive "list of teams and people that Dick Vitale talked about Monday night that had absolutely nothing to do with the Louisville/Connecticut game he was calling."

The list was 156 items long.

Deadspin picked the post up the next morning, and life on this little blog of ours would never be the same.

The list was linked ubiquitously on the Internet for the next couple of days, resulting in a thrashing of the site's previous high of six visitors on the day after Louisville won the Orange Bowl. Then, just when it appeared things had settled down, the list was became the focus of both a Bob Hill column in The Courier-Journal and a Marc Katz column in the Dayton Daily News.

Some guy named Mike was a star.

With the list in such high circulation, some guy named Mike couldn't help but wonder if its inspiration, its initiator, had seen, um, it.

The answer was unearthed when The University Daily Kansan sports columnist Travis Robinett sat down with Vitale to talk about a previous column he'd written in which he had interviewed me and focused on the announcer and the list.

Turns out Dickie V. had indeed visited Card Chronicle, and he hadn't particularly enjoyed his stay.

"Am I guilty of (name dropping) at times," Vitale said. "Probably so, but first of all that game was not a good game. It was ugly in the first half, so what you try to do is keep people there. I mean, there are reasons you do some of the things you do.

"I've been doing this for 28 years and if I weren't doing it in a positive way, would I get the reaction I do from people? Plus, the coaches, players, they come to me all the time and say 'Dickie V, we love your spirit, your enthusiasm.' I mean, am I going to be perfect? Nobody's perfect. I make mistakes. I get upset at myself at times and ask myself, 'Why did you say that?' or 'Why did you do that?' I'm my biggest critic."

Vitale and I, who first met and formed a deep friendship during a Hawley-Cooke book signing in 1994, have still not spoken since. So would we call this a celebrity feud? Yes, that's exactly what we would call it, because I'm the one in charge of the semantics.

I wrote this after Vitale's comments came out, and can't think of a better way to put it today:

Truth is I like Vitale, I like him a lot. Everyone who knows him or has met him in passing speaks extremely highly of his character, I think his overall impact on college basketball has been positive, and his efforts with regards to Cancer research have been extremely noble. I actually still have an autographed Vitale mini-ball that I got as a gift many years ago.

I just hate that he's allowed himself to become this cartoon character. His excitement is fantastic when used appropriately, and when he was at his best years ago it merely served as the perfect accent to the wealth of intelligent insight he brought to the table. But he's let this thing get out of hand, and somewhere along the line he became nothing more than a parody of himself.

And now it's spreading.

Commentators and other TV personalities desperate to distinguish themselves are mimicking Vitale with the hope that it will make them famous. I think it's a safe bet that the success of Vitale has played a large part in the evolution of the monster that has become Lee Corso. We seem to be about a decade away from having Gilbert Gottfried behind the CBS News Desk.

Eight years ago Vitale wrote a book subtitled Why the Game I Love is Breaking My Heart. Vitale is now the one breaking hearts by letting himself become something that is detrimental to the overall state of a game that myself, and many others around these parts, believe is the best in the world.

Tonight's a big deal, Dick, let's go ahead and treat it as such.

0 recs  |  Comment 16 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Bet You Feel

a little cleaner after recounting this. Might have thought you had it out of your system, but not quite. Now you are rid of it. First time for me, as I’ve only been around here a while. Thanks.
I was gonna add #157 but I’ll consider the first inappropriate/irrelevant/self puffing celeb mentioned tonight as that number.

So we stay at #7. So what, I don’t mind that, don’t mind it at all.

Good luck, tonight, everybody.

Roz

by Roz on Feb 2, 2009 2:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

And...

…and I might have said this before: I don’t like the way he strong arms corporations and individuals to give to the “V Fund” EXCLUSIVELY.
    We have ALL been PERSONALLY effected by the ravages of cancer.
    There are other worthy causes too.

    When he “holds up” some well-to-do people and some of the smaller corporations for his own pet charity, then, maybe the same people and corporations might give it all to “V”, and not have anything for the other deserving causes, too.

    OK, I might be wrong about this one, and if so, you guys will let me have it. Deservedly so.

P.S. I wonder what the “grub” was that Mike was “heating up.” Mmmmm.

by Roz on Feb 2, 2009 3:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't know old Dickie V dropped in

got a little verbosely worked up about it too

surprise

by frankpos on Feb 2, 2009 2:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

AMEN...

I tell friends and family that I can only take so much Vitale and have to mute the TV during non-life threatening moments when he’s broadcasting. Many people can’t understand my distaste for this popular man, but Mike has nailed it squarely on the head here.

A few years ago, when the movie “Glory Road” was being promoted, Vitale’s partner asked if he was going to see it. Vitale’s response was classic and distracting… “You gonna buy the popcorn? You gonna buy the popcorn? You gonna buy the popcorn? You gonna buy the popcorn?”. I hit the mute button for the remainder of that game.

Grog

"There is no OFF position to the genius switch" - D. Letterman

by GrogInOhio on Feb 2, 2009 3:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

my 2 cents...

I also like Vitale. I think the work he has done for the V foundation is amazing and what he has dont for college basketball has been very good. I do agree is has turned into a caricature of himself with the “Awesome with a capital A Bay-Bee”, but when he is on the top of his game in a really good college basketball game, its very fun to watch. He engages the crowds at the game and gets them pumped up and the personally stories i have heard from people who have met him have shown the kind of person he is.

I do wish Vitale would stick to the game more, but i also wonder if anyone has charted any other announcers and how often them mention things that have nothing to do with the game they are calling. Not sure we’d see anyone get 156, but i’m sure there are a few that would crack the 100 mark

by Ben Go CARDS on Feb 2, 2009 3:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

What's worse about Dicky V is how off topic he gets

A lot of color announcers will talk about other teams and players, and they’ll drift into other sports in the event of another big game coming up (like the Superbowl). But really, the man was talking about Rosie O’Donnell and Donald Trump. There’s no call for that in a college basketball game. He’s paid to entertain people, but most people watching college basketball couldn’t care less about anything Rosie O’Donnell does.

by CARD_G6 on Feb 2, 2009 3:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It really is sad that he's gotten so bad.

I used to be a big fan of Dick Vitale. Okay, so not a BIG fan, but I did like his commentary. He was upbeat, energetic, and really cared about basketball. On top of that, he generally seemed to know what he was talking about. But when I first heard that he was announcing the game tonight, I was pissed. That’s what it’s come to.

It started a few years ago, right around my sophomore year of college I’d say. That’s when I started watching more basketball. And the more I watched it, the more I began to dislike the man. Not only did the whole “Unbelievable, Baby!” get really old, but it always seemed like he was still talking about the same things. It was always how good Duke, UNC, and UK were, every time I watched it. After a while, the only thing I could relate it to was the infamous “Git r done;” mildly amusing at first, a little worn out later, and finally painfully maddening and overused.

But I think one reason that certain people notice it more than others depends on how much you watch basketball. The majority of people that will occasionally (or even always) watch their team play, and don’t watch much basketball outside of that, usually don’t have a problem with. But they only get a few doses a year, and that’s if they’re a fan of a major team. Those of us who avidly watch all basketball find it much harder to deal with because we get so much in one season. This will make the second time I’ve listened to him in three days, and probably the fifth or sixth time I’ve listened to him this season, and it just gets to be too much. It’s like the morning person you work with; you don’t really hate them or their enthusiasm per se (after all, it’s better than if they were a dick), but after a while you begin to feel like it’s a just a charade, because nobody can possibly be that over-the-top all the time.

by CARD_G6 on Feb 2, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

But the point is...

Vitale started the “talk about anything but the game” trend of announcing. It’s like a plague now; nobody bothers to call the game action. They’re all too busy trying to convince you of their wit, their intellect, their friends in high places, their whatever. Just call the damn game.

That said, I agree that Mr. Vitale is a sincere and dedicated person. Anyone who has seen his speeches to youngsters at various camps around the country can testify to that. He cries. A lot. And that’s fine because he really believes what he’s saying. It’s just too bad he allowed himself to become someone annoying and, in some cases, infuriating. When’s the last time he said something concerning a game that made you scratch your chin and say “hey, that’s right. I missed that.” Hasn’t happened in years, I’d bet.

theoldman

by theoldman on Feb 2, 2009 3:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

one thing i do really appreciate about vitale

is his knowledge of the game. On the NCAA slecetion show, all the other guys have stacks of papers with notes on all the teams, why they might be seeded high, why they might be low, why they might not get it. Vitale has nothing. No notes. Maybe he could make better comments with some facts in front of him, but he still knows the game, knows the teams and knows the players.

by Ben Go CARDS on Feb 2, 2009 3:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My $.02

I like to hear Vitale providing color under 2 primary circumstances:
(1) the game does not involve UofL (or Duke or UNC, either); or
(2) the game involves UofL and UofL has just gone on a big run or made a last second basket (see UL @ Marquette, 2003).

His excitement can make a boring game exciting, and if I don’t have an emotional investment in the game, I don’t mind an occasional dalliance into the irrelevant. While Vitale breaks the "occasional" limitation on my statement, he can be pretty clever and creative with his pop culture meanderings. But when I care about the outcome of the game, those are annoyances to the Roseanne Barr degree.

In his defense, ESPN doesn’t make money tonight by holding the interests of the UConn and UofL fans. We’re committed. Or even the die-hard college basketball fan. If they have the time, there’s only one thing going to be on their screen. ESPN, and Dick, make money by keeping the interests of the casual fan who might want to check out How I Met Your Mother (good show) or Chuch (don’t care) if the game gets a little dry. That’s tough for us purists to stomach, but it’s part of the deal if we want to pay Pitino and raise enough money for Kragthorpe’s buy-out.

by 83fan on Feb 2, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I was with you

until you implied that How I Met Your Mother was better than Chuck.

More importantly, DickyV will be trying to keep the interests of the casual fan who might want to check out Chuck in 3D tonight at 8:00!

by Dais on Feb 2, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm agnostic on Chuck.

I haven’t seen an episode and don’t want to add another show to my list of TIVO recordings out of fear of losing some saved Cards games. It looks like a show I might like, but I can’t make myself care about any more programs.

by 83fan on Feb 2, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dicky V

Right on about Dicky V. Gime me Billy Packer any day. He’s an ass, but atleast he watches the game. Tonight will be one of those Tv turned down, radio on kind of nights.

Good luck to the Cardinals tonight.

Great blog by the way.

Go UC!

by Husky Fan on Feb 2, 2009 4:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Card Chronicle, the Louisville sports blog Otis George might read if he knew it existed.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Fire_truck_1_small
Let T-Will Dunk
Small
CCS catches eye of national punditry once again
Small
Most exciting UL sporting events of the last decade?
Images_small
Stats v. Rutgers
Small
Rutgers @ Louisville: previews hard to come by
Small
Basketball scholarship situation
Small
Justin Coleman commits!!!!
Small
good recruiting class
Small
National signing day
Small
PITT leaving for big ten could be devastating to big east football.......

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Admm_small Mike Rutherford

Official Partner of CBS Sports