Offense
Obviously, the thing most of us are going to take away from our lost football season is the inability of Kragthorpe and Stubbs to properly utilize the many returning pieces of one of the great offenses in UL history. Basically, we pissed away talent more carelessly than Pluto in Animal House. My question is now, how did it happen?
Most people are blaming the playcalling which I certainly agree has been atrocious, but I think it goes deeper than that. It goes to Krags' overall philosophy on offense. From what I see, we basically have turned into a dink and dunk passing game and "taking what the defense gives us".
This is bullshit. We are playing right into the defense's hands with this. A highly successful defensive philosophy (in the NFL at least) uses this exact same philosophy in stopping offensives (the Tampa/cover 2). The Cover 2 gives the offensive the underneath and check down crap and forces you to string together long, efficient drives. Even in the NFL, offenses struggle to but together sustained drives consistently, so what makes us think it is going to work in college?
We need the big play back in the offense and we need it bad. It will open up the running game and give us a chance to be relevant again. Instead, I head to Tampa next week thinking I would rather be in the `Ville watching us take on Hartford and Jackson St. Depressing.
Few other quick notes from the game:
-Deon Palmer played as well as I have seen a UL safety play since Kerry Rhodes. I know he might have taken a bad angle on the White run, but overall, very impressive.
-Thursday Night Football took a huge turn for the worse when Herbstreit went to Saturday nights. Mike summed it up best- Craig James Sucks.
-I wish Owen Schmidt would have knocked himself out with that fucking helmet.
0 recs |
1 comment
Comments
Good post
I like that.
The dink and dunk, let's try to complete 65 passes for 250-yards offense is fine when you're working with the athletes at say, oh I don't know, Tulsa, but when you have an NFL quarterback, two NFL receivers, and potentially an NFL tight end (eat more beef Gary) it makes substantially less sense.
The philosophy certainly bugs me, but we have enough talent to overcome that right now, so the play-calling, to me, is easily the most maddening thing. And it's not just the "run for 7 on first down, throw an incomplete pass on 2nd, and then run it on 3rd and 3" decisions. We've run the same bootleg pass on the first drive in the last two games and in both games it's worked perfectly, and then in both games we haven't seen it again. And honest to God it looks like we have 12 offensive plays out there. It's like watching Ballard High School's offense.
We had an extra week to prepare for this game, and I saw absolutely nothing different on offense, with the unfortunate exception of no Bilal Powell (I'm not going to drop it).
It's all so frustrating.
by Mike Rutherford on Nov 9, 2007 1:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 











